Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30809010›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2019

Molecular evidence for novel mercury methylating microorganisms in sulfate-impacted lakes.

Daniel S Jones, Gabriel M Walker, Nathan W Johnson, Carl P J Mitchell, Jill K Coleman Wasik, Jake V Bailey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The origin of methyl group in methanogen-mediated mercury methylation: From the Wolfe cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent advance of microbial mercury methylation in the environment.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Expression Levels ofEnvironmental science & technology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbiology spectrum · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel S JonesBioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. daniel.s.jones@nmt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-0418
Gabriel M WalkerDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nathan W JohnsonDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.
Carl P J MitchellDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto - Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8538-5138
Jill K Coleman WasikDepartment of Plant and Earth Science, University of Wisconsin River Falls, River Falls, WI, USA.
Jake V BaileyDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · USUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–River Falls · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) is a bioaccumulative neurotoxin that is produced by certain anaerobic microorganisms, but the abundance and importance of different methylating populations in the environment is not well understood. We combined mercury geochemistry, hgcA gene cloning, rRNA methods, and metagenomics to compare microbial communities associated with MeHg production in two sulfate-impacted lakes on Minnesota's Mesabi Iron Range. The two lakes represent regional endmembers among sulfate-impacted sites in terms of their dissolved sulfide concentrations and MeHg production potential. rRNA amplicon sequencing indicates that sediments and anoxic bottom waters from both lakes contained diverse communities with multiple clades of sulfate reducing Deltaproteobacteria and Clostridia. In hgcA gene clone libraries, however, hgcA sequences were from taxa associated with methanogenesis and iron reduction in addition to sulfate reduction, and the most abundant clones were from unknown groups. We therefore applied metagenomics to identify the unknown populations in the lakes with the capability to methylate mercury, and reconstructed 27 genomic bins with hgcA. Some of the most abundant potential methylating populations were from phyla that are not typically associated with MeHg production, including a relative of the Aminicenantes (formerly candidate phylum OP8) and members of the Kiritimatiellaeota (PVC superphylum) and Spirochaetes that, together, were more than 50% of the potential methylators in some samples. These populations do not have genes for sulfate reduction, and likely degrade organic compounds by fermentation or other anaerobic processes. Our results indicate that previously unrecognized populations with hgcAB are abundant and may be important for MeHg production in some freshwater ecosystems.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial ProteinsLakesMercuryMethylationMethylmercury CompoundsMicrobiotaSulfatesSulfidesBacterial ProteinsMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsSulfatesSulfides

Identifiers

PMID30809010
PMCPMC6776050
OpenAlexW2917585407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.