Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808905›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Host plant and population source drive diversity of microbial gut communities in two polyphagous insects.

Asher G Jones, Charles J Mason, Gary W Felton, Kelli Hoover

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. GlobalISME communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Conditional effects ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asher G JonesDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. abj5150@psu.edu.
Charles J MasonDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Gary W FeltonDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Kelli HooverDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbioses between insects and microbes are ubiquitous, but vary greatly in terms of function, transmission mechanism, and location in the insect. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) are one of the largest and most economically important insect orders; yet, in many cases, the ecology and functions of their gut microbiomes are unresolved. We used high-throughput sequencing to determine factors that influence gut microbiomes of field-collected fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) and corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea). Fall armyworm midgut bacterial communities differed from those of corn earworm collected from the same host plant species at the same site. However, corn earworm bacterial communities differed between collection sites. Subsequent experiments using fall armyworm evaluating the influence of egg source and diet indicated that that host plant had a greater impact on gut communities. We also observed differences between regurgitant (foregut) and midgut bacterial communities of the same insect host, suggesting differential colonization. Our findings indicate that host plant is a major driver shaping gut microbiota, but differences in insect physiology, gut region, and local factors can also contribute to variation in microbiomes. Additional studies are needed to assess the mechanisms that affect variation in insect microbiomes, as well as the ecological implications of this variability in caterpillars.

Indexed as

BiodiversityGastrointestinal MicrobiomePlantsAnimalsHerbivorySpodopteraSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30808905
PMCPMC6391413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.