Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808869›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Quantitative sensing and signalling of single-stranded DNA during the DNA damage response.

Susanne C S Bantele, Michael Lisby, Boris Pfander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA Damage and Replication Stress Checkpoints.Annual review of biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. MAM-STAT3-Driven Mitochondrial CaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A DNA damage-induced phosphorylation circuit enhances Mec1Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne C S BanteleMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, DNA Replication and Genome Integrity, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-3626
Michael LisbyDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4830-5247
Boris PfanderMax Planck Institute of Biochemistry, DNA Replication and Genome Integrity, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. bpfander@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2180-5054

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DNA damage checkpoint senses the presence of DNA lesions and controls the cellular response thereto. A crucial DNA damage signal is single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which is frequently found at sites of DNA damage and recruits the sensor checkpoint kinase Mec1-Ddc2. However, how this signal - and therefore the cell's DNA damage load - is quantified, is poorly understood. Here, we use genetic manipulation of DNA end resection to induce quantitatively different ssDNA signals at a site-specific double strand break in budding yeast and identify two distinct signalling circuits within the checkpoint. The local checkpoint signalling circuit leading to γH2A phosphorylation is unresponsive to increased amounts of ssDNA, while the global checkpoint signalling circuit, which triggers Rad53 activation, integrates the ssDNA signal quantitatively. The global checkpoint signal critically depends on the 9-1-1 and its downstream acting signalling axis, suggesting that ssDNA quantification depends on at least two sensor complexes.

Indexed as

DNA DamageCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, FungalDNA, Single-StrandedHistonesPhosphorylationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2DNA, FungalDNA, Single-StrandedHistonesRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30808869
PMCPMC6391461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.