Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808818›Full record

ReviewScience signaling2019

Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-β family signaling.

Rik Derynck, Erine H Budi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science signaling, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 454 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
454citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
30.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

454 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 734 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NADBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

394 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rik DerynckDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology and Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. rik.derynck@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4407-6990
Erine H BudiDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology and Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9019-4958
Broad Center · US

Funding

TGF-Beta and Smad-mediated regulation of gene expressionR01CA063101 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DERYNCK, RIK M · 1995 to 2014
$6.4M
TGF-beta-induced non-Smad signaling events and cancer cell behaviorR01CA136690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DERYNCK, RIK M · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA063101NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encoded in mammalian cells by 33 genes, the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family of secreted, homodimeric and heterodimeric proteins controls the differentiation of most, if not all, cell lineages and many aspects of cell and tissue physiology in multicellular eukaryotes. Deregulation of TGF-β family signaling leads to developmental anomalies and disease, whereas enhanced TGF-β signaling contributes to cancer and fibrosis. Here, we review the fundamentals of the signaling mechanisms that are initiated upon TGF-β ligand binding to its cell surface receptors and the dependence of the signaling responses on input from and cooperation with other signaling pathways. We discuss how cells exquisitely control the functional presentation and activation of heteromeric receptor complexes of transmembrane, dual-specificity kinases and, thus, define their context-dependent responsiveness to ligands. We also introduce the mechanisms through which proteins called Smads act as intracellular effectors of ligand-induced gene expression responses and show that the specificity and impressive versatility of Smad signaling depend on cross-talk from other pathways. Last, we discuss how non-Smad signaling mechanisms, initiated by distinct ligand-activated receptor complexes, complement Smad signaling and thus contribute to cellular responses.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationGene Expression RegulationHumansLigandsNeoplasmsProtein BindingReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaSignal TransductionTransforming Growth Factor betaLigandsReceptors, Transforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID30808818
PMCPMC6800142
OpenAlexW2917714624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.