Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808670›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Surgical fasciectomy versus collagenase injection in treating recurrent Dupuytren disease: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Jesper Nordenskjöld, Anna Lauritzson, Markus Waldén, Philippe Kopylov, Isam Atroshi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406338 (Surgical Fasciectomy Versus Collagenase Injection in Treating Recurrent Dupuytren Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03406338 phase4active not recruitingnot on this map

Surgical Fasciectomy Versus Collagenase Injection in Treating Recurrent Dupuytren Disease: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion SkaneRan2018 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsDupuytren Disease of FingerArmsFasciectomy, Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jesper NordenskjöldDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.ORCID -0002-8049-5263
Anna LauritzsonDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Markus WaldénDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Philippe KopylovDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Isam AtroshiDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm-Kristianstad Hospitals, Hässleholm, Sweden.
Lund University · SEHässleholms Sjukhus · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is no definitive cure for Dupuytren disease (DD), and recurrence of finger contractures after treatment is common. Surgical fasciectomy is considered the standard treatment method for recurrence, although associated with a high incidence of complications. Collagenase injection, a non-surgical treatment option, has been shown to be a safe and effective method; however, most studies regarding collagenase have involved first-time treatment. Collagenase efficacy in patients with recurrent DD beyond the immediate effect has not yet been determined. The aim of our study is to compare surgical fasciectomy and collagenase injection in treating recurrent DD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Inclusion criteria are recurrence of DD in one or more fingers after previous treatment with fasciectomy or collagenase injection, a passive extension deficit ≥30° in the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and/or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, and a palpable cord causing the recurrent contracture. A total of 56 patients will be randomised to either surgical fasciectomy or collagenase injection. A hand therapist blinded to patients' group allocation will measure range of motion at baseline, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months. The primary outcomes are the total active extension deficit (MCP plus PIP) at 3 months and the proportion of patients with contracture worsening ≥20° in the treated finger joint at 2 years compared with 3 months. The secondary outcomes include changes in total active motion, active and passive extension deficit from baseline up to 5 years, scores on patient-reported outcome measures, adverse events and costs of treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board, Lund University, Sweden(2017/623). The trial will be conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2000. The results of the trial will be disseminated as published articles in peer-reviewed journals.

trial registrationNCT03406338; Pre-results.

Indexed as

CollagenasesDupuytren ContractureFasciotomyAdultHumansInjectionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceCollagenasesdupuytren’s contracturehand surgeryrct

Identifiers

PMID30808670
PMCPMC6398619
OpenAlexW2921471177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.