Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808536›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

An analytic approach to identifying the sources of the low-frequency round window cochlear response.

Aryn M Kamerer, Mark E Chertoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aryn M KamererCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE, USA. Electronic address: aryn.kamerer@boystown.org.
Mark E ChertoffDepartment of Hearing & Speech, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Boys Town · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Diagnosing outer hair cell health along the cochlear partitionR33DC011096 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHERTOFF, MARK E · 2012 to 2014
$738k
NIDCD NIH HHS R33 DC011096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlear microphonic, traditionally thought of as an indication of electrical current flow through hair cells, in conjunction with suppressing high-pass noise or tones, is a promising method of assessing the health of outer hair cells at specific locations along the cochlear partition. We propose that the electrical potential recorded from the round window in gerbils in response to low-frequency tones, which we call cochlear response (CR), contains significant responses from multiple cellular sources, which may expand its diagnostic purview. In this study, CR is measured in the gerbil and modeled to identify its contributing sources. CR was recorded via an electrode placed in the round window niche of sixteen Mongolian gerbils and elicited with a 45 Hz tone burst embedded in 18 high-pass filtered noise conditions to target responses from increasing regions along the cochlear partition. Possible sources were modeled using previously-published hair cell and auditory nerve response data, and then weighted and combined using linear regression to produce a model response that fits closely to the mean CR waveform. The significant contributing sources identified by the model are outer hair cells, inner hair cells, and the auditory nerve. We conclude that the low-frequency CR contains contributions from several cellular sources.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsCochlear Microphonic PotentialsCochlear NerveGerbillinaeHair Cells, Auditory, InnerHair Cells, Auditory, OuterModels, AnimalModels, NeurologicalNonlinear DynamicsRound Window, Ear

Identifiers

PMID30808536
PMCPMC6416063
OpenAlexW2913220257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.