Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808444›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2019

No evidence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool samples of 1,544 asylum seekers arriving in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, April 2016 to March, 2017.

Lutz Ehlkes, Yvonne Pfeifer, Guido Werner, Ralf Ignatius, Manfred Vogt, Tim Eckmanns, Philipp Zanger, Jan Walter

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases ProducingInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Review
  6. High prevalence of methicillin-resistantJournal of migration and health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lutz EhlkesFederal State Agency for Consumer & Health Protection Rhineland-Palatinate, Koblenz, Germany.
Yvonne PfeiferRobert Koch Institute, Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance, Wernigerode, Germany.
Guido WernerRobert Koch Institute, Nosocomial Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance, Wernigerode, Germany.
Ralf IgnatiusMVZ Labor 28, Berlin, Germany.
Manfred VogtFederal State Agency for Consumer & Health Protection Rhineland-Palatinate, Koblenz, Germany.
Tim EckmannsRobert Koch Institute, Nosocomial Infections and Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance, Berlin, Germany.
Philipp ZangerFederal State Agency for Consumer & Health Protection Rhineland-Palatinate, Koblenz, Germany.
Jan WalterThese two authors have contributed equally to this manuscript and share last authorship.
Robert Koch Institute · DEMVZ Labor Ravensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince 2015, increased migration from Asia and Africa to Europe has raised public health concerns about potential importation of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE), specifically those producing carbapenemases (C-PE), into European hospitals.

aimsTo inform infection control practices about ESBL-PE prevalence in asylum seekers and to investigate whether C-PE prevalence exceeds that in the German population.

methodsCross-sectional study from April 2016-March 2017. Routinely collected stool samples from asylum seekers were tested for antibiotic resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Country/region of origin and demographic characteristics were explored as risk factors for faecal colonisation.

resultsOf 1,544 individuals, 294 tested positive for ESBL-PE colonisation (19.0%; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 17.0-21.0). Asylum seekers originating from Afghanistan/Pakistan/Iran had a prevalence of 29.3% (95% CI: 25.6-33.2), from Syria 20.4% (95% CI: 16.1-25.2) and from Eritrea/Somalia 11.9% (95% CI: 8.7-15.7). CTX-M-15 (79%) and CTX-M-27 (10%) were the most common ESBL determinants. Highest ESBL-PE prevalences were observed in boys under 10 years and women aged 20-39 years (interaction: p = 0.03). No individuals tested positive for C-PE. Faecal C-PE colonisation prevalence in asylum seekers was not statistically significantly different from prevalence reported in German communities.

conclusionIn absence of other risk factors, being a newly arrived asylum seeker from a region with increased faecal ESBL-PE colonisation prevalence is not an indicator for C-PE colonisation and thus not a reason for pre-emptive screening and isolation upon hospital admission.

Indexed as

Carbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarrier StateCross-Sectional StudiesEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFecesFemaleGermanyHumansInfection ControlMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseAfghanistanbeta-lactamase CTX-M-15carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceaecommunicable diseasescross-sectional studiesdrug resistanceE. coli ST131emergingepidemiologyEritreaESBL, beta-lactamase CTX-M-27Escherichia colihuman migrationinfectious disease transmissionIranmass screeningmicrobialPakistanplasmid mediated fluoroquinolone resistanceprevalencerefugeesSomaliaSyria

Identifiers

PMID30808444
PMCPMC6446954
OpenAlexW2915846872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.