Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808420›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2019

Ocular toxicity of intravitreal melphalan for retinoblastoma in Chinese patients.

Kang Xue, Hui Ren, Fengxi Meng, Rui Zhang, Jiang Qian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Abemaciclib Inhibits Retinoblastoma Tumor Growth by Targeting CDK1/2.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Risk factors for cataract in retinoblastoma management.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Is intravitreal topotecan toxic to retinal function?The British journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kang XueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairmentand Restoration of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Hui RenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairmentand Restoration of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Fengxi MengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairmentand Restoration of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Rui ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairmentand Restoration of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Jiang QianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairmentand Restoration of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China. qianjiang58@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8504-7857
Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai 20144Y0264Science and Technology Commission of the Shanghai Municipality 14411961800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy, complications, and clinical characteristics, including the ocular toxicity, of intravitreal melphalan(IVM) treatment for vitreous seeding in Chinese retinoblastoma patients.

methodsThis was a retrospective, non-comparative analysis including 30 consecutive eyes of 23 patients with viable persistent or recurrent vitreous seeding following retinoblastoma treatment. All of the eyes received IVM injections (20-33 μg). Vitreous seeding control, determination of the ocular toxicity, and the clinical characteristics of intravitreal melphalan treatments were observed.

resultsThe mean patient age at the time of the injection was 28 months (median = 22 months, range = 12-50 months). In total, 80 injections were administered in 30 eyes, the overall enucleation-free survival rate was 83.3% (25/30). The complications included retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroidal atrophy (19/30, 63.3%), pupillary synechiae (13/30, 43.3%), iris atrophy (12/30, 40%), retinal vascular occlusion (12/30, 40.0%), optic atrophy (6/30, 20%), vitreous hemorrhage (3/30, 10%), persistent hypotonia and phthisis bulbi (4/30 13.3%), and cataracts (8/30, 26.6%). Twelve eyes demonstrated grade 3 or greater IVM-associated retinal or anterior segment toxicity post injection. Mean dosage given showed significant difference between the groups. There were no significant differences in the retinal toxicity grades regarding the seed classification or seed regression patterns.

conclusionsIntravitreal melphalan is an effective treatment for refractory vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma, but exhibits both anterior and posterior segment toxicity in Chinese patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMelphalanNeoplasm SeedingRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaRetrospective StudiesVitreous BodyAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingMelphalanIntravitreal melphalanOcular toxicityRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID30808420
PMCPMC6390546
OpenAlexW2923237429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.