ArticleStem cell research & therapy2019
Automated digital image quantification of histological staining for the analysis of the trilineage differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fibroblast-Derived ECM as a Donor-Specific Pro-Osteogenic Coating Surpassing ASC- and Osteoblast-Derived ECM.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- A cellular automaton model of osteogenic differentiation reveals identifiability limits of endpoint assays.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Article
- Live monitoring uncovers divergent epigenetic remodeling during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Isolation and differentiation of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells from Arabian mares.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Current Trends and Future Opportunities of AI-Based Analysis in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Imaging: A Scoping Review.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal progenitor-derived proteoglycan 4 regulates the transdifferentiation of chondrocytes into osteoblasts during fracture healing.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Article
- Polydeoxyribonucleotide ameliorates IL-1β-induced impairment of chondrogenic differentiation in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- LINE-1 RNA triggers matrix formation in bone cells via a PKR-mediated inflammatory response.The EMBO journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Murine iPSC-Loaded Scaffold Grafts Improve Bone Regeneration in Critical-Size Bone Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- T-cadherin modulates adipogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells: insights into ligand interactions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- The issue of heterogeneity of MSC-based advanced therapy medicinal products-a review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Development of an image processing software for quantification of histological calcification staining images.PloS one · 2023Article
- Rapid Prototypable Biomimetic Peristalsis Bioreactor Capable of Concurrent Shear and Multi-Axial Strain.Cells, tissues, organs · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a Novel Thiol-Norbornene-Functionalized Gelatin Hydrogel for Bioprinting of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Validation of a color deconvolution method to quantify MSC tri-lineage differentiation across species.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Comparison of Semi-Quantitative Scoring and Artificial Intelligence Aided Digital Image Analysis of Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Article
- Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles-Toxicity and Effect of In Ovo Inoculation on Chicken Embryo Development, Broiler Performance and Bone Status.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Identification of ALP+/CD73+ defining markers for enhanced osteogenic potential in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells by mass cytometry.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the potential to repair and regenerate damaged tissues and are considered as attractive candidates for the development of cell-based regenerative therapies. Currently, there are more than 200 clinical trials involving the use of MSCs for a wide variety of indications. However, variations in their isolation, expansion, and particularly characterization have made the interpretation of study outcomes or the rigorous assessment of therapeutic efficacy difficult. An unbiased characterization of MSCs is of major importance and essential to guaranty that only the most suitable cells will be used. The development of standardized and reproducible assays to predict MSC potency is therefore mandatory. The currently used quantification methodologies for the determination of the trilineage potential of MSCs are usually based on absorbance measurements which are imprecise and prone to errors. We therefore aimed at developing a methodology first offering a standardized way to objectively quantify the trilineage potential of MSC preparations and second allowing to discriminate functional differences between clonally expanded cell populations.
methodMSCs originating from several patients were differentiated into osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondroblasts for 14, 17, and 21 days. Differentiated cells were then stained with the classical dyes: Alizarin Red S for osteoblasts, Oil Red O for adipocytes, and Alcian Blue 8GX for chondroblasts. Quantification of differentiation was then performed with our newly developed digital image analysis (DIA) tool followed by the classical absorbance measurement. The results from the two techniques were then compared.
resultQuantification based on DIA allowed highly standardized and objective dye quantification with superior sensitivity compared to absorbance measurements. Furthermore, small differences between MSC lines in the differentiation potential were highlighted using DIA whereas no difference was detected using absorbance quantification.
conclusionOur approach represents a novel method that simplifies the laboratory procedures not only for the quantification of histological dyes and the degree of differentiation of MSCs, but also due to its color independence, it can be easily adapted for the quantification of a wide range of staining procedures in histology. The method is easily applicable since it is based on open source software and standard light microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.