Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808356›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

The impact of Anopheles gambiae egg storage for mass rearing and production success.

Ernest Mazigo, Winifrida Kidima, Joseph Myamba, Eliningaya J Kweka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ernest MazigoDepartment of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Winifrida KidimaDepartment of Zoology and Wildlife Conservation, College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Joseph MyambaNational Institute for Medical Research, Amani Medical Research Centre, P.O. Box 81, Muheza, Tanzania.
Eliningaya J KwekaDepartment of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania. eliningaya.kweka@tpri.go.tz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-758X
University of Dar es Salaam · TZCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZNational Institute for Medical Research · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass rearing requires a large colony from which male individuals can be harvested for sterilization and release. Attention is needed when monitoring life parameters of the reared population, knowing that any variations within the target population would lead to mismatching between two populations. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.) egg storage on hatchability and life history traits. For each parameter, comparison was made between freshly laid and stored eggs in three densities (40, 80, 120 eggs).

methodsAnopheles gambiae s.s. freshly laid eggs were collected from the Tropical Pesticide Research Institute (TPRI) insectary. Eggs to be stored were kept at - 20 °C for 10 min and then transferred to refrigerators at 4 °C for intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days. After respective storage days, the eggs were transferred from refrigerators to ambient temperature of (25 ± 2) °C for 24 h and then placed in incubators for 24 h. Thereafter eggs were hatched. The egg hatchability, emerged larvae development, larvae survival and emerged adult sex ratios were monitored.

resultsThis study found that hatching rates decreased with increase in storage time. The difference was significant in eggs stored for 10 and 15 days (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in hatching rates between An. gambiae eggs stored for 5 days and freshly hatched eggs (P > 0.05). Anopheles larvae development (L1 to pupae) was not significantly affected by storage time across all hatching densities. The study also found that larvae survival decreased with increase in egg storage time. However, there was no significant difference between larvae from freshly hatched eggs and those from eggs at 5 and 10 storage days (P > 0.05) but not for eggs stored for 15 days. Furthermore, there was a decrease in emerged adult males and increase in females relative to increased time of egg storage. The difference was significant (P < 0.05) at 15 storage days but not for eggs stored for 5 and 10 days (in triplicate densities).

conclusionFrom this study it was concluded that storing An. gambiae eggs at 4 °C and 48 ± 2% relative humidity (RH) for 5 days is the optimal condition and time that did not affect egg hatching rates, larval development and survivorship and emerged adult mosquito sex ratio.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesCold TemperatureEntomologyFemaleHumidityMalePreservation, BiologicalSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsZygoteAnopheles gambiaeHatch rate indexLife history traitsMass rearingPlasmodium falciparumSterile insect technique

Identifiers

PMID30808356
PMCPMC6390356
OpenAlexW2929945702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.