Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808342›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019

Investigating heartbeat-related in-plane motion and stress levels induced at the aortic root.

Wei Wei, Morgane Evin, Stanislas Rapacchi, Frank Kober, Monique Bernard, Alexis Jacquier, Cyril J F Kahn, Michel Behr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei WeiLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, LBA, UMR T24, 51 Bd. P. Dramard, 13015, Marseille, France. wei.wei@ifsttar.fr.
Morgane EvinLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, LBA, UMR T24, 51 Bd. P. Dramard, 13015, Marseille, France.
Stanislas RapacchiAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, France.
Frank KoberAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, France.
Monique BernardAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, France.
Alexis JacquierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, France.
Cyril J F KahnLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, LBA, UMR T24, 51 Bd. P. Dramard, 13015, Marseille, France.
Michel BehrLaboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée, Aix-Marseille Université, IFSTTAR, LBA, UMR T24, 51 Bd. P. Dramard, 13015, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale · FRTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe axial motion of aortic root (AR) due to ventricular traction was previously suggested to contribute to ascending aorta (AA) dissection by increasing its longitudinal stress, but AR in-plane motion effects on stresses have never been studied. The objective is to investigate the contribution of AR in-plane motion to AA stress levels.

methodsThe AR in-plane motion was assessed on magnetic resonance imagining data from 25 healthy volunteers as the movement of the AA section centroid. The measured movement was prescribed to the proximal AA end of an aortic finite element model to investigate its influences on aortic stresses. The finite element model was developed from a patient-specific geometry using LS-DYNA solver and validated against the aortic distensibility. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) approach was also used to simulate blood hydrodynamic effects on aortic dilation and stresses.

resultsThe AR in-plane motion was 5.5 ± 1.7 mm with the components of 3.1 ± 1.5 mm along the direction of proximal descending aorta (PDA) to AA centroid and 3.0 ± 1.3 mm perpendicularly under the PDA reference system. The AR axial motion elevated the longitudinal stress of proximal AA by 40% while the corresponding increase due to in-plane motion was always below 5%. The stresses at proximal AA resulted approximately 7% less in FSI simulation with blood flow.

conclusionsThe AR in-plane motion was comparable with the magnitude of axial motion. Neither axial nor in-plane motion could directly lead to AA dissection. It is necessary to consider the heterogeneous pressures related to blood hydrodynamics when studying aortic wall stress levels.

Indexed as

MovementStress, MechanicalAdultAortaFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAortic root motionAortic stressFinite elementFluid–structure interactionMagnetic resonance imagining

Identifiers

PMID30808342
PMCPMC6391796
OpenAlexW2929995407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.