Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30808340›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Abortion in Nepal: perspectives of a cross-section of sexual and reproductive health and rights professionals.

Claire Rogers, Sabitri Sapkota, Anita Tako, Jaya A R Dantas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire RogersInternational Health Programme, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Western Australia. claire.rogers@postgrad.curtin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-7443
Sabitri SapkotaMarie Stopes International, London, UK.
Anita TakoIndependent Sexual and Reproductive Health Consultant, Bhaktapur, Nepal.
Jaya A R DantasInternational Health Programme, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, 6102, Western Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-4330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, women face many barriers in the attainment of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). Since 2002, the legalisation of abortion in Nepal has seen significant progress in the expansion of safe abortion and family planning services.

methodsThis qualitative, exploratory study was conducted in 2014 and uses nine in-depth, open-ended interviews with a cross-section of SRHR professionals, to explore their perspectives on abortion in Nepal. The study was underpinned by the Assets Focused Rapid Participatory Appraisal (AFRPA) research methodology and used the health information pyramid conceptual framework.

resultsThematic content analysis revealed emerging themes relating to barriers to access and uptake of skilled safe abortion services and post-abortion family planning. Findings also emphasised current practical and legal components relating to the provision of medical abortion through pharmacies and highlighted issues of sex-selective abortion within the predominantly patriarchal society.

conclusionEffective and ongoing sector-wide monitoring and evaluation of safe abortion services and their staff is essential for women in Nepal to have adequate access to effective and efficient safe abortion services, access to contraception and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information post-abortion and to ensure adherence to current Safe Abortion Policy. It is critical that the unsafe (less and least safe) provision of medical abortion through pharmacies and sex-selective abortion continues to be investigated and that innovative strategies are formulated to ensure the cultural, reproductive and sexual health and rights of Nepali women are realised.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelFamily Planning ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityReproductive MedicineSafetyContraceptionFemaleHealth PolicyHuman RightsHumansInterviews as TopicNepalReproductive HealthSexual HealthSocial StigmaAbortionContraceptionFamily planningNepalSexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR)

Identifiers

PMID30808340
PMCPMC6390627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.