Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30807595›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Behavioural responses of humpback whales to food-related chemical stimuli.

Bertrand Bouchard, Jean-Yves Barnagaud, Marion Poupard, Hervé Glotin, Pauline Gauffier, Sara Torres Ortiz, Thomas J Lisney, Sylvie Campagna, Marianne Rasmussen, Aurélie Célérier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Humpback whale (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuroanatomy of the Cetacean Sensory Systems.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Olfaction of aquatic amniotes.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Bertrand BouchardBehavioural Ecology Group, CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8670-0299
Jean-Yves BarnagaudBehavioural Ecology Group, CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Marion PoupardDYNI team, LIS, Université de Toulon, Université Aix-Marseille, CNRS, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8235-5184
Hervé GlotinDYNI team, LIS, Université de Toulon, Université Aix-Marseille, CNRS, Marseille, France.
Pauline GauffierCIRCE, Conservation, Information and Research on Cetaceans, Algeciras-Pelayo, Cadiz, Spain.
Sara Torres OrtizMarine Biological Research Centre, Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Kerteminde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1065-9194
Thomas J LisneyBehavioural Ecology Group, CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Sylvie CampagnaUniversité de Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Marianne RasmussenHúsavík Research Centre, University of Iceland, Húsavík, Iceland.
Aurélie CélérierBehavioural Ecology Group, CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-EPHE, Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCIRCE - Centro Tecnológico · ESUniversité de Nîmes · FRUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Baleen whales face the challenge of finding patchily distributed food in the open ocean. Their relatively well-developed olfactory structures suggest that they could identify the specific odours given off by planktonic prey such as krill aggregations. Like other marine predators, they may also detect dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a chemical released in areas of high marine productivity. However, dedicated behavioural studies still have to be conducted in baleen whales in order to confirm the involvement of chemoreception in their feeding ecology. We implemented 56 behavioural response experiments in humpback whales using two food-related chemical stimuli, krill extract and DMS, as well as their respective controls (orange clay and vegetable oil) in their breeding (Madagascar) and feeding grounds (Iceland and Antarctic Peninsula). The whales approached the stimulus area and stayed longer in the trial zone during krill extract trials compared to control trials, suggesting that they were attracted to the chemical source and spent time exploring its surroundings, probably in search of prey. This response was observed in Iceland, and to a lesser extend in Madagascar, but not in Antarctica. Surface behaviours indicative of sensory exploration, such as diving under the stimulus area and stopping navigation, were also observed more often during krill extract trials than during control trials. Exposure to DMS did not elicit such exploration behaviours in any of the study areas. However, acoustic analyses suggest that DMS and krill extract both modified the whales' acoustic activity in Madagascar. Altogether, these results provide the first behavioural evidence that baleen whales actually perceive prey-derived chemical cues over distances of several hundred metres. Chemoreception, especially olfaction, could thus be used for locating prey aggregations and for navigation at sea, as it has been shown in other marine predators including seabirds.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsAntarctic RegionsBirdsChemoreceptor CellsCuesEcosystemEuphausiaceaFeeding BehaviorFoodFood ChainHumpback WhaleIcelandMadagascarModels, BiologicalOdorantsdimethyl sulfideSulfides

Identifiers

PMID30807595
PMCPMC6391047
OpenAlexW2915806881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.