Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30807411›Full record

Trial reportFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery

A 12-Month Clinical Durability of Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of a Vaginal Bowel Control System for the Nonsurgical Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.

Holly E Richter, Gena Dunivan, Heidi W Brown, Uduak Andy, Keisha Y Dyer, Charles Rardin, Tristi Muir, Shane McNevin, Ian Paquette, Robert E Gutman and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Technology for managing incontinence: What are the research priorities?Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Research progress in female pelvic floor rehabilitation aids.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Holly E Richter
Gena DunivanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM.
Heidi W BrownUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Uduak AndyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Keisha Y DyerKaiser Permanente San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Charles RardinBrown University, Providence, RI.
Tristi MuirHouston Methodist, Houston, TX.
Shane McNevinProvidence Surgical Specialists, Providence, RI.
Ian PaquetteChrist Hospital, Spokane, WA.
Robert E GutmanMedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Lieschen QuirozUniversity of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
Jennifer WuUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Brown University · USChrist Hospital · USHouston Methodist · USKaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USProvidence College · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Wisconsin Multidisciplinary K12 Urologic Research Career Development ProgramK12DK100022 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAD M. VEZINA · 2013 to 2026
$8.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to characterize clinical success, impact on quality of life, and durability up to 1 year in women with fecal incontinence (FI) responsive to an initial test period with a trial vaginal bowel control system.

methodsThis was a prospective open-label study in subjects with FI and successfully fit who underwent an initial 2-week trial period. Those achieving 50% or greater reduction in FI episodes were provided the long-term system. Primary outcome was success at 3 months defined as 50% or greater reduction in baseline FI episodes, also assessed at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included symptom impact measured with Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale, symptom severity by the St Mark's (Vaizey) questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and satisfaction. Adverse events were collected. Primary analysis was intention to treat (ITT).

resultsSeventy-three subjects with baseline mean of 14.1 ± 12.15 FI episodes over 2 weeks entered the treatment period. Success rate at 3 months was 72.6% (53/73, P < 0.0001); per-protocol, 84.1% (53/63, P < 0.0001). Significant improvement in all Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life subscales and St Mark's questionnaire meeting minimally important differences was noted. Satisfaction was 91.7%, 89.7%, and 94.4% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively; 77.4%, 77.6%, and 79.6% were very much/much better on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Most common adverse event was vaginal wall injury, with most adverse events (90/134, 67%) occurring during fitting period.

conclusionsIn women with successful fitting and initial treatment response, durable efficacy was seen at 3, 6, and 12 months by objective and subjective measures, with favorable safety.

Indexed as

Equipment and SuppliesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeVaginaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30807411
PMCPMC6659396
OpenAlexW2915434345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.