Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30807275›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2019

Vaporization of Marijuana Among Recreational Users: A Qualitative Study.

Elizabeth R Aston, Samantha G Farris, Jane Metrik, Rochelle K Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Is There a Place for Cannabinoids in Asthma Treatment?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Subjective effects of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis versus alcohol-only use: A qualitative analysis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Associations of mode of administration on cannabis consumption and subjective intoxication in daily life.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A qualitative analysis of cannabis vaporization among medical users.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth R AstonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Samantha G FarrisDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Jane MetrikCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Rochelle K RosenDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Heath, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

Marijuana's Impact on Alcohol Motivation and ConsumptionR01AA024091 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI METRIK, JANE · 2016 to 2019
$2.0M
Behavioral Economic Analysis of Demand for MarijuanaK01DA039311 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ASTON, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2019
$902k
Advancing Reproductive Health: Qualitative Methods & Interdisciplinary MentorshipK24HD062645 · NICHD · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI GUTHRIE, KATE M · 2012 to 2016
$689k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024091NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD062645NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA039311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVaporization of marijuana products, or "vaping," has become a prevalent mode of administration and is typically perceived to hold unique benefits compared to combustible administration methods. Such positive beliefs regarding marijuana vaporization may contribute to its abuse liability. This qualitative study examined cognitions pertaining to vaping among recreational marijuana users.

methodFocus groups were conducted with frequent marijuana users (N = 31; five groups; six to seven per group; M = 5.0 days/week marijuana use). Three topic areas were queried during discussions with the goal of revealing factors that may contribute to the abuse liability of vaporization. These comprised differences between smoking and vaporizing marijuana products, perceived advantages of vaporization, and perceived disadvantages of vaporization. Focus groups lasted approximately 60 minutes and followed a semistructured agenda; the sessions were audio recorded and transcribed for an applied thematic analysis. An executive summary of each group was made and key themes pertaining to vaporization were summarized.

resultsSeveral themes emerged, including differences between smoking and vaporizing marijuana, convenience, discretion, and efficiency of vaping, perceived health benefits, the absence of traditional smoking rituals, and the high cost of vaporization devices.

conclusionsSeveral factors appear to promote marijuana vaporization, including device aspects (e.g., discreet, convenient), the subjective high, economical efficiency, and perceived harm-reducing and health-promoting effects. These qualitative data highlight unique cognitions about marijuana vaping that may substantially increase its abuse liability. Quantitative research is needed to examine the extent to which cognitions about marijuana vaporization contribute to actual use patterns and problematic behaviors.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultCognitionFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingPrevalenceVolatilization

Identifiers

PMID30807275
PMCPMC6396515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.