ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019
Reducing the time between inoculation and first-read of urine cultures using total lab automation significantly reduces turn-around-time of positive culture results with minimal loss of first-read sensitivity.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Total Laboratory Automation on Urine Culture Turnaround Time: A Comparative Study Between Manual Workflow and WASPLab™.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Rapid Identification ofRisk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Urinary tract infections: pathogenesis, host susceptibility and emerging therapeutics.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- The Impact of Laboratory Automation on the Time to Urine Microbiological Results: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Article
- Stop Waiting for Tomorrow: Disk Diffusion Performed on Early Growth Is an Accurate Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing with Reduced Turnaround Time.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Article
- Substantial overlap between symptomatic and asymptomatic genitourinary microbiota states.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Performances of automated digital imaging of Gram-stained slides with on-screen reading against manual microscopy.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021Article
- Total Laboratory Automation and Three Shifts Reduce Turnaround Time of Cerebrospinal Fluid Culture Results in the Chinese Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Consolidation of Clinical Microbiology Laboratories and Introduction of Transformative Technologies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020Review
- Impact of Total Laboratory Automation on Turnaround Times for Urine Cultures and Screening Specimens for MRSA, ESBL, and VRE Carriage: Retrospective Comparison With Manual Workflow.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to realize the full potential of total laboratory automation (TLA) in the clinical microbiology laboratory, workflows must be optimized to match each laboratory's capabilities, patient population, and staffing model. Using TLA-based digital photography to monitor urine cultures, we sought to improve culture result turn-around-time (TAT) by changing the time at which a culture is first photographed and thus available for analysis/work-up (Pre1) from 18 h (16,391 cultures) to 16 h (53,113 cultures) (with a total of 24-h culture incubation in both time periods); in both time periods, cultures were set up 24/7, and culture work-up occurred during the day shift only. With this change, we observed a significant decrease in time-to-final-result TAT for positive cultures (18 h-Pre1 median: 71.6 h; 16 h-Pre1 median: 61.0 h). This effect was most pronounced for Gram-negative organisms, with a median reduction in time-to-final-result for Escherichia coli cultures (51.8% of positive urine cultures) of 14.2 h (18 h-Pre1 median: 77.3 h; 16 h-Pre1 median: 63.1 h). This reduction in TAT was accompanied by a decrease in sensitivity at the Pre1 time point (18 h-Pre1 91.01%; 16 h-Pre1 88.06%), which we also found to vary by species: there was a reduction in sensitivity at the first culture reading of 1 to 2% for cultures with Gram-negative microorganisms, but for some Gram-positive microorganisms (e.g., Aerococcus urinae and non-aureus Staphylococcus species), there was a reduction in sensitivity at the Pre1 time-point of 3 to 7%. These results can guide workflow decisions for laboratories seeking to implement and/or optimize TLA systems, demonstrating a tradeoff between TAT and the sensitivity of preliminary urine culture results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30806903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.