SynthesisJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2019
Psychosocial Intervention Programs for Parents of Children with Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Comparison of Programs' Models and Development.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Return to Work Interventions for Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and a Methodological Critique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Co-creating support: a participatory research approach to developing a group intervention program for parents of children diagnosed with cancer.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in children with solid tumors: a single-center exploratory study of sociodemographic, clinical, school, and social functioning correlates.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Adaptation and usability study of the fear of cancer recurrence therapy for parents of survivors of childhood cancer (Parent-FORT).Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Closing the evidence gap: why childhood cancer research must include fathers.Public health reviews · 2026Article
- A Multi-Site Refinement Study ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Feasibility Study of Taking Back Control Together, an Intervention to Support Parents of Children with Cancer.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024Article
- Development of a Mixed Hypnosis and Music Intervention Program for the Management of Pain, Anxiety, and Wellbeing in End-of-Life Palliative Care.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Protocol for mapping psychosocial screening to resources in pediatric oncology: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intervention programs have been developed to help parents cope with their child's cancer. Despite some studies reporting a high level of evidence, it is unclear how these programs build on each other. Appraising models of change is critical to advance scientific knowledge and provide evidence-based interventions. This review aims to identify existing programs, explicitly formulate their underlying models, evaluate how they translate into concrete activities, as well as identify and discuss their development process. Eleven programs based on models of change from cognitive-behavioral, systemic and counselling theories were identified. Many models included a sound theoretical framework, targeted outcomes, as well as implementation strategies. In most cases, preliminary development studies were conducted, but details were rarely provided on how development stages informed the redesign of intervention programs. Acceptability and treatment fidelity were not available for one-third of the programs. Future reports should document the development and design redesign stages prior to conducting efficacy trials, as this step would provide crucial details to critically appraise programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30806900What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.