Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806864›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2019

Psychometric Properties of Child (0-5 Years) Outcome Measures as used in Randomized Controlled Trials of Parent Programs: A Systematic Review.

Nicole Gridley, Sarah Blower, Abby Dunn, Tracey Bywater, Maria Bryant

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social-Emotional Development of Children in Asia: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole GridleyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1881-5502
Sarah BlowerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. sarah.blower@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9168-9995
Abby DunnDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-8413
Tracey BywaterDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-8753
Maria BryantClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7690-4098
University of York · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/93/10Department of Health PHR/13/93/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review is one of the three which sought to identify measures commonly implemented in parenting program research, and to assess the level of psychometric evidence available for their use with this age group. This review focuses specifically on measures of child social-emotional and behavioral outcomes. Two separate searches of the same databases were conducted; firstly to identify eligible instruments, and secondly to identify studies reporting on the psychometric properties of the identified measures. Five commercial platforms hosting 19 electronic databases were searched from their inception to conducted search dates. Twenty-four measures were identified from Search 1: a systematic search of randomized controlled trial evaluations of parenting programs. For Search 2, inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied to 21,329 articles that described the development and/or validation of the 24 measures identified in Search 1. Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. resulting in 11 parent report questionnaires and three developmental assessment measures for review. Data were extracted and synthesized to describe the methodological quality of each article using the COSMIN checklist alongside the overall quality rating of the psychometric property reported for each measure. Measure reliability was categorized into four domains (internal consistency, test-re-test, inter-rater, and intra-rater). Measure validity was categorized into four domains (content, structural, convergent/divergent, and discriminant). Results indicated that supporting evidence for included measures is weak. Further work is required to improve the evidence base for those measures designed to assess children's social-emotional and behavioral development in this age group. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42016039600.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChild DevelopmentParentingPsychometricsChild, PreschoolEducation, NonprofessionalEmotional AdjustmentHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSocial BehaviorCOSMINOutcome measuresPsychometric propertiesSocial emotional developmentSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID30806864
PMCPMC6669186
OpenAlexW2911266930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.