Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806829›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2019

CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Laura M Spring, Seth A Wander, Mark Zangardi, Aditya Bardia

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M SpringMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Lawrence House 304, 10 North Grove St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Seth A WanderMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Lawrence House 304, 10 North Grove St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Mark ZangardiMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Lawrence House 304, 10 North Grove St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Aditya BardiaMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Lawrence House 304, 10 North Grove St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Bardia.Aditya@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Physician Scientist Training in Cancer ResearchT32CA009172 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI Jennifer R Brown, James A. DeCaprio · 1985 to 2026
$17.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002542 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2018 to 2022
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002542NCI NIH HHS L30 CA220758NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo describe the clinical role of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC) as well as current controversies and evolving areas of research. RECENT

findingsPalbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are each approved in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant for HR+ MBC. Abemaciclib is also approved as monotherapy for pre-treated patients. Key questions in the field include whether all patients with HR+ MBC should receive a CDK 4/6 inhibitor up front versus later line, impact on overall survival, role of continued CDK 4/6 blockade, mechanism of clinical resistance, and treatment sequencing. The development of CDK 4/6 inhibitors has changed the therapeutic management of HR+ MBC. Additional research is needed to determine optimal treatment sequencing, understand mechanisms governing resistance, and develop novel therapeutic strategies to circumvent or overcome clinical resistance and further improve the outcomes of patients with MBC.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6FemaleHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase InhibitorsAbemaciclibClinical trialsCyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6Metastatic breast cancerPalbociclibResistance mechanismsRibociclib

Identifiers

PMID30806829
PMCPMC6573012
OpenAlexW2916822761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.