Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806808›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Effects of septorhinoplasty on smell perception.

Luciana Carolina Peruzzo Kokubo, Thiago Bittencourt Ottoni Carvalho, Marco Aurélio Fornazieri, Eduardo Monteiro de Castro Gomes, Cláudia Maggy Faulstich Alves, André Luiz Lopes Sampaio

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Olfactory Sequelae of Nasal Surgeries: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Therapies for Olfactory Dysfunction - an Update.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana Carolina Peruzzo KokuboHospital Universitário de Brasília, University of Brasília School of Medicine, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70910900, Brazil. luciana.c.peruzzo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-7073
Thiago Bittencourt Ottoni CarvalhoHospital Universitário de Brasília, University of Brasília School of Medicine, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70910900, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio FornazieriPontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Eduardo Monteiro de Castro GomesStatistical Department, University of Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Cláudia Maggy Faulstich AlvesHospital Universitário de Brasília, University of Brasília School of Medicine, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70910900, Brazil.
André Luiz Lopes SampaioHospital Universitário de Brasília, University of Brasília School of Medicine, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70910900, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether significant changes in smell perception occur after septorhinoplasty, and evaluate whether septum deviation, allergic rhinitis, and surgical technique affect postoperative smell perception.

methodsThirty-four patients (> 18 years old) awaiting septorhinoplasty were included, while those with previous severe hyposmia or anosmia were excluded. The participants self-assessed their smell perception using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm indicated the inability to smell and 100 mm indicated normal smell perception. The University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was applied before the procedure, and 4 and 12 weeks after surgery.

resultsThe UPSIT score showed no significant changes at 4 (p = 0.59; 95% CI - 0.35 to + 2) or 12 weeks (p = 0.16; 95% CI - 1.13 to + 0.66). A comparison of the VAS scores before and 4 weeks after surgery (p = 0.62; 95% CI - 0.63 to + 0.39) yielded similar results. However, the average VAS scores improved 12 weeks after surgery (p = 0.007; 95% CI + 0.22 to + 1.30). Olfactory function, measured using the UPSIT, was not influenced by open or closed surgical techniques (p ≥ 0.10), the presence or absence of rhinitis (p ≥ 0.15), or obstructive septum deviation (p ≥ 0.38). Twelve weeks after surgery, self-evaluated smell perception was better in patients who underwent a closed procedure rather than an open procedure (p = 0.006; 95% CI: -1.39 to -0.37).

conclusionA validated test demonstrates that septorhinoplasty does not compromise smell perception 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. However, it might improve smell perception by the self-report observation.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SeptumNose Deformities, AcquiredOlfaction DisordersPostoperative ComplicationsRhinitis, AllergicRhinoplastySelf ReportSensory ThresholdsSmellVisual Analog ScaleYoung AdultOlfactionRhinoplastySeptal deviationSeptoplastySeptorhinoplastySmell perceptionUPSITVAS

Identifiers

PMID30806808
OpenAlexW2915480927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.