Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806772›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Altered risky decision making in patients with early non-affective psychosis.

Luk Msk, Chang Wc, Chong Csy, Siu Cmw, Chan Skw, Lee Emh, Hui Clm, Sun Yn, Lee Tmc, Lo Tl and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of past experiences on decision-making in autism spectrum disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luk MskDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Chang WcDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. changwc@hku.hk.
Chong CsyDepartment of Psychiatry, Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Siu CmwDepartment of Psychiatry, Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Chan SkwDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lee EmhDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Hui ClmDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Sun YnDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lee TmcState Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Lo TlDepartment of Psychiatry, Kwai Chung Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Chen EyhDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Funding

NARSAD Young Investigator Grant by Brain & Behavior Research Foundation 25309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal risky decision making may represent an important factor contributing to functional impairment in psychotic disorders. Previous research revealed impaired decision making under risk in patients with chronic schizophrenia. However, risky decision making is under-studied in the early course of illness. We examined risky decision making in 33 patients with early non-affective psychosis and 32 demographically matched controls, using two well-validated experimental paradigms, balloon analogue risk task (BART) and Risky-Gains task (RGT), which modeled and assessed actual risk-taking behaviors in deliberative and time-pressured decision-making situations, respectively. Our results showed that patients exhibited suboptimal decision making on the BART and were more risk averse than controls by having fewer average balloon pumps in non-burst trials, lower explosion rate and lower total points gained. On the RGT, patients also behaved more conservatively than controls, with lower overall rate in choosing the risky option. Intriguingly, patients performed comparably to controls in adjusting risk-taking pattern following punished trials, suggesting relatively preserved sensitivity to punishment in early psychosis. Risk-taking measures showed no significant correlations with any symptom dimensions, impulsivity traits, cognitive functions or antipsychotic treatment after correcting for multiple comparisons. This study is the first to investigate risk-taking propensity in early psychosis based on BART/RGT performance, and consistently indicate that patients with early psychosis displayed altered risky decision making with increased risk aversion relative to healthy participants. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the longitudinal course of aberrant risky decision making and its relationship with functional outcome in early psychosis.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaDecision MakingHumansImpulsive BehaviorRisk-TakingBalloon Analogue Risk TaskEarly psychosisRisk aversionRisk takingRisky–Gains task

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.