ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019
Clinical efficacy of new JAK inhibitors under development. Just more of the same?
Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Dose-escalating ruxolitinib for refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Safety and Pharmacokinetics of the Oral TYK2 Inhibitor PF-06826647: A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study.Clinical and translational science · 2021Trial
- Effects of Janus Kinase Inhibitors on Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain: Clinical Evidence and Mechanistic Pathways.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Article
- VX-509 attenuates the stemness characteristics of colorectal cancer stem-like cells by regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition through Nodal/Smad2/3 signaling.World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Current Approach to Risk Factors and Biomarkers of Intestinal Fibrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Review
- Temperature-triggered in situ forming lipid mesophase gel for local treatment of ulcerative colitis.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Sarcoidosis: Updates on therapeutic drug trials and novel treatment approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: case presentation and literature review.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Role of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Therapy of Psoriasis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- The Therapeutic Landscape of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current State and Future Directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Off-Patent Biological and Biosimilar Medicines in Belgium: A Market Landscape Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Type I Interferons in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2020Review
- Tofacitinib and Baricitinib Are Taken up by Different Uptake Mechanisms Determining the Efficacy of Both Drugs in RA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Review
- Review
- JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future.Biomolecules · 2020Review
- The Promise of JAK Inhibitors for Treatment of Sarcoidosis and Other Inflammatory Disorders with Macrophage Activation: A Review of the Literature.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibition is promising in the treatment of RA, with already two oral drugs marketed. New compounds are under investigation that are more selective for Janus kinase 1 or Janus kinase 3. Phase II results for filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib and decernotinib are reviewed showing almost consistently a fast dose-dependent clinical improvement similar to already approved drugs tofacitinib and baricitinib. I will reflect on the most frequently reported dose-dependent adverse events and laboratory changes. Some are similar for all drugs of this class, some are more specific for a certain drug, but all may influence future treatment effectiveness in daily practice. This implies the need for a critical evaluation of phase III trials, and eventually trials specifically powered for conclusions on the safety profile and registries once these drugs become marketed. These innovative drugs also need head-to-head trials versus biologics or in-class as well as specific strategy studies to determine their optimal future use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.