Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806706›Full record

ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2019

Clinical efficacy of new JAK inhibitors under development. Just more of the same?

Rene Westhovens

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rene WesthovensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Janus kinase inhibition is promising in the treatment of RA, with already two oral drugs marketed. New compounds are under investigation that are more selective for Janus kinase 1 or Janus kinase 3. Phase II results for filgotinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib and decernotinib are reviewed showing almost consistently a fast dose-dependent clinical improvement similar to already approved drugs tofacitinib and baricitinib. I will reflect on the most frequently reported dose-dependent adverse events and laboratory changes. Some are similar for all drugs of this class, some are more specific for a certain drug, but all may influence future treatment effectiveness in daily practice. This implies the need for a critical evaluation of phase III trials, and eventually trials specifically powered for conclusions on the safety profile and registries once these drugs become marketed. These innovative drugs also need head-to-head trials versus biologics or in-class as well as specific strategy studies to determine their optimal future use.

Indexed as

AdamantaneArthritis, RheumatoidAzetidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHumansJanus Kinase 1Janus Kinase 3Janus Kinase InhibitorsNiacinamidePiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesPyrroles2-((2-(1H-pyrrolo(2,3-b)pyridin-3-yl)pyrimidin-4-yl)amino)-2-methyl-N-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)butanamideAdamantaneAzetidinesbaricitinibGLPG0634Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingJanus Kinase 1Janus Kinase 3Janus Kinase InhibitorsNiacinamidepeficitinibPiperidinesPurinesPyrazolesPyridinesPyrimidinesPyrrolesSulfonamidestofacitinibTriazolesupadacitinibValinedecernotinibfilgotinibJanus kinase inhibitorpeficitinibRAupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID30806706
PMCPMC6390876
OpenAlexW2917252704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.