ArticlePhysiological reports2019
Sustained exercise hyperemia during prolonged adenosine infusion in humans.
Article in Physiological reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determining the Physiological Threshold for Angina (ORBITA-FIRE): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.Circulation · 2026Trial
- Muscle blood flow is independent of conduit artery diameter following prior vasodilation in males.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Sustained exercise hyperemia during prolonged adenosine infusion in humans.Physiological reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The contribution of Adenosine (ADO) to exercise hyperemia remains controversial and it is unknown whether ADO can evoke the prolonged vasodilation seen during exercise bouts. Therefore, we tested hypotheses in the human forearm during 3 h of intra-arterial high dose ADO infusion: (1) skeletal muscle blood flow would wane over time; (2) exercise hyperemic responses during ADO administration would be unaffected compared to baseline. Using sodium nitroprusside (SNP), we tested parallel hypotheses regarding nitric oxide (NO) in a separate group of participants. Seventeen young healthy participants (ADO: n = 9; SNP: n = 8) performed multiple rhythmic handgrip exercise bouts (20% of maximum), two during saline and five during 3 h of continuous drug infusion. Five minutes of ADO infusion resulted in a ~5-fold increase in forearm vascular conductance (FVC; 4.8 ± 0.6 vs. 24.2 ± 3.2 mL/min/100 mmHg, P < 0.05). SNP caused a ~4-fold increase (4.4 ± 0.6 vs. 16.6 ± 2 mL/min/100 mmHg, P < 0.05). FVC did not wane over time with ADO (24.2 ± 3.2 and 22 ± 1.2 mL/min/100 mmHg [P > 0.05]) or SNP (16.6 ± 2 and 14.1 ± 2.4 mL/min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.