Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30806017›Full record

Trial reportThoracic cancer2019

Preventive skin analgesia with lidocaine patch for management of post-thoracotomy pain: Results of a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study.

Alfonso Fiorelli, Caterina Pace, Roberto Cascone, Annalisa Carlucci, Emanuele De Ruberto, Anna Cecilia Izzo, Beatrice Passavanti, Paolo Chiodini, Vincenzo Pota, Caterina Aurilio and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfonso FiorelliThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0628-613X
Caterina PaceAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Roberto CasconeThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Annalisa CarlucciThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Emanuele De RubertoThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Anna Cecilia IzzoThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Beatrice PassavantiAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Paolo ChiodiniStatistical Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo PotaAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Caterina AurilioAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Mario SantiniThoracic Surgery Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Pasquale SansoneAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate whether pre-emptive skin analgesia using a lidocaine patch 5% would improve the effects of systemic morphine analgesia for controlling acute post-thoracotomy pain.

methodsThis was a double-blind, placebo controlled, prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive lidocaine 5% patch (lidocaine group) or a placebo (placebo group) three days before thoracotomy. Postoperative analgesia was induced in all cases with intravenous morphine analgesia. The intergroup differences were assessed in order to evaluate whether the lidocaine patch 5% would have effects on pain intensity when at rest and after coughing (primary end-point) on morphine consumption, on the recovery of respiratory function, and on peripheral painful pathways measured with N2 and P2 laser-evoked potential (secondary end-points).

resultsA total of 90 patients were randomized, of whom 45 were allocated to the lidocaine group and 45 to the placebo group. Lidocaine compared with the placebo group showed a significant reduction in pain intensity both at rest (P = 0.013) and after coughing (P = 0.015), and in total morphine consumption (P = 0.001); and also showed a better recovery of flow expiratory volume in one second (P = 0.025) and of forced vital capacity (P = 0.037). The placebo group compared with the lidocaine group presented a reduction in amplitude of N2 (P = 0.001) and P2 (P = 0.03), and an increase in the latency of N2 (P = 0.023) and P2 (P = 0.025) laser-evoked potential.

conclusionsThe preventive skin analgesia with lidocaine patch 5% seems to be a valid adjunct to intravenous morphine analgesia for controlling post-thoracotomy pain. However, our initial results should be corroborated/confirmed by larger studies.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnalgesiaAnesthetics, LocalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLidocaineMaleMorphinePain MeasurementPostoperative PainPreventive MedicineProspective StudiesThoracotomyTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalLidocaineMorphineLidocaine patchpost-thoracotomy painpre-emptive analgesiathoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID30806017
PMCPMC6449230
OpenAlexW2915689639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.