Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805898›Full record

ArticleInfection2019

Improving quality of antifungal use through antifungal stewardship interventions.

Sarah Julia Lachenmayr, Dorothea Strobach, Sophie Berking, Heidi Horns, Karin Berger, Helmut Ostermann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Antifungal stewardship in solid organ transplantation.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Assessment of Caspofungin use at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital and compliance with IDSA guidelines and FDA labelings.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Article
  14. Evaluation of a stewardship program of antifungal use at a Brazilian tertiary care hospital.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Julia LachenmayrHospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Sarah.Lachenmayr@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-9789
Dorothea StrobachHospital Pharmacy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-0605
Sophie BerkingDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-0255
Heidi HornsDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Karin BergerDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Helmut OstermannDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Helmut.Ostermann@med.uni-muenchen.de.
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years antifungal stewardship (AFS) programmes have been increasingly recommended to provide optimal antifungal treatment. In a previous study (study I) in the department of haematology and oncology of a German tertiary care hospital we found areas for improvement concerning antifungal prescription. Subsequently, AFS measures were implemented and their impact on quality of antifungal use was assessed in this study.

methodsAFS measures included medical training (two sessions), a pocket card summarising main recommendations for antifungal use, and daily pharmaceutical counselling on the ward. In a 6-month observational study, antifungal prescriptions were analysed and compared to the previously collected data (study I) concerning indication, choice of drug, dosing, duration and drug-drug interactions. The study was approved by the university hospital ethical review board.

resultsAntifungal agents were prescribed for 103/1169 inpatients. Compared to study I, a significant increase in dosage accuracy (+ 19.3%; p < 0.05) and correct choice of drug (+ 15.9%; p < 0.05) was noted, as well as a decrease in potential clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with concomitant medication (- 13.9%; p < 0.05). However, no significant improvement in indication and duration of antifungal treatment was identified. 56 recommendations were given to the prescribing physicians (acceptance rate: 66.1%).

conclusionsThe implementation of AFS interventions based on pharmaceutical presence on the ward was associated with an improvement in antifungal use; however, indication and duration of therapy need to be communicated by infectious disease specialists. Considering the proportionally short observation period, the long-term effects of our AFS interventions need to be further investigated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDrug PrescriptionsFemaleGermanyHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersYoung AdultAntifungal AgentsAntifungal stewardshipDrug safetyHaematology/oncologyInvasive fungal infectionQuality assessmentUse of antifungals

Identifiers

PMID30805898
OpenAlexW2916523831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.