ArticleObesity surgery2019
Validation of the Use of Electronic Medical Records for Identification of Post-gastric Bypass Hypoglycemia Cases.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of statistical process control in quality improvement projects in abdominal surgery: a PRISMA systematic review.BMJ open quality · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to validate an algorithm designed to identify patients with post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia (PGBH) using clinician chart review.
methodsWe conducted a chart review study of non-diabetic patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at our institution from 2004 to 2013. The electronic medical record (EMR) algorithm was based on any post-operative glucose <60 mg/dl, diagnosis of hypoglycemia, or medication use for treatment of PGBH and identified 158 charts as PGBH and 1048 charts without PGBH. Two clinicians independently reviewed a random selection of 80 cases and 80 control charts and determined the presence or absence of PGBH by searching the chart using keywords and reviewing laboratory results, medications, and clinic notes.
resultsOf the 160 charts reviewed, the EMR algorithm agreed with the chart review for 130 (accuracy = 80%, 95% CI = 75-87%) with sensitivity of 89% (95% CI = 83-96%) and specificity of 86% (95% CI = 78-93%). We improved the algorithm's accuracy to 90% by limiting the search to data obtained 3 months or more following RYGB.
conclusionThe EMR algorithm has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to identify post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia within our patient cohort. The use EMR-based algorithms may be a useful tool for future research to improve our understanding of epidemiology and risk factors for post-bariatric surgery hypoglycemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.