Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805850›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2019

Functional connectivity between memory and reward centers across task and rest track memory sensitivity to reward.

Lea E Frank, Alison R Preston, Dagmar Zeithamova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reward systems, cognition, and emotion: Introduction to the special issue.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lea E FrankDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University Street, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Alison R PrestonCenter for Learning and Memory and Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Dagmar ZeithamovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University Street, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA. dasa@uoregon.edu.

Funding

Hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory integrationR01MH100121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alison R Preston · 2013 to 2026
$7.3M
Medial temporal lobe contributions to flexible use of memoryF32MH094085 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZEITHAMOVA, DAGMAR · 2011 to 2013
$168k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH094085NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External motivation, such as a promise of future monetary reward for remembering an event, can affect which events are remembered. Reward-based memory modulation is thought to result from encoding and post-encoding interactions between dopaminergic midbrain, signaling reward, and hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex, supporting episodic memory. We asked whether hippocampal and parahippocampal interactions with other reward-related regions are related to reward modulation of memory and whether such relationships are stable over time. Individuals' memory sensitivity to reward was measured using a monetary incentive encoding task in which a cue indicated potential monetary reward (penny, dime, or dollar) for remembering an upcoming object pair. Functional connectivity between memory and reward regions was measured before, during, and following the task. Reward-related regions of interest were generated using a meta-analysis of existing studies on reward and included ventral striatum, medial and orbital prefrontal cortices and anterior cingulate cortex, in addition to midbrain. The results showed that connectivity between memory and reward regions tracked individual differences in reward modulation of memory, irrespective of when connectivity was measured. Connectivity patterns of anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal cortex, and ventral striatum covaried together and tracked behavior most strongly. These findings implicate a broader set of reward regions in reward modulation of memory than considered previously and provide new evidence that stable connectivity patterns between memory and reward centers relate to individual differences in how reward impacts memory.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicRewardAdolescentAdultConnectomeFemaleGyrus CinguliHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPrefrontal CortexVentral StriatumYoung AdultEpisodic memoryFunctional connectivityHippocampusMotivationPrefrontal cortexReward

Identifiers

PMID30805850
PMCPMC7137582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.