Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805774›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Assessment of tumor promoting effects of amniotic and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and in vivo.

Ming-Yao Meng, Lin Li, Wen-Ju Wang, Fei-Fei Liu, Jian Song, Song-Lin Yang, Jing Tan, Hui Gao, Yi-Yi Zhao, Wei-Wei Tang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ming-Yao MengCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Lin LiCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Ju WangCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Fei-Fei LiuCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jian SongCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Song-Lin YangCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Jing TanCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Hui GaoCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Yi ZhaoCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Wei TangCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Rui HanCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Kai ZhuCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China.
Li-Wei LiaoCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China. 841434725@qq.com.
Zong-Liu HouCentral Laboratory of Yan'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, No. 245 East of Renmin Road, Kunming, 650051, Yunnan, People's Republic of China. hzl579@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3536-7550

Funding

Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunological Prevention and Treatment of Yunnan Province 2017DG004Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province 2017FB149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHuman mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have been applied in a variety of therapies recently. However, the role of MSCs in tumor progression remains largely elusive. Some studies demonstrated that MSCs can promote tumor growth, while others had opposite results. Therefore, the lack of evidence about the effect of MSCs on tumor cells impedes its further use.

methodsIn the current study, hMSCs from amniotic membrane (hAMSCs) and umbilical cord (hUCMSCs) were used to evaluate the effects of MSCs on tumor development in vitro and in vivo. Two different animal models based on subcutaneous xenograft bearing nude mice and a murine experimental metastatic model were established for in vivo study. Moreover, cytokines regulated by MSCs co-cultured with cancer cells SPC-A-1 were also analyzed by cytokine array.

resultsOur results indicated that hUCMSCs not only did not promote proliferation in cancer cells, but also inhibited migration. In addition, they inhibited tube formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Although hAMSCs also showed inhibitory effects on cancer cell motility, the proliferation of cancer cells was indeed enhanced. The in vivo data revealed that hUCMSCs did not promote tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma and gastric carcinoma xenografts. Nevertheless, hAMSCs could do. The results from murine experimental metastatic model also demonstrated that neither hUCMSCs nor hAMSCs significantly enhanced the lung metastasis. The data from cytokine array showed that 11 inflammatory factors, 8 growth factors and 11 chemokines were remarkably secreted and changed.

conclusionsIn view of the data from in vitro and in vivo studies, the exploitation of hUCMSCs in new therapeutic strategies should be safe compared to hAMSCs under malignant conditions. Moreover, this is the first report to systematically elucidate the possible molecular mechanisms involved in UCMSC- and AMSC-affected tumor growth and metastasis.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAmnionAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticCoculture TechniquesCulture Media, ConditionedCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsBiomarkersCulture Media, ConditionedCytokinesAmniotic mesenchymal stem cellsCancerCytokinesMSCsUmbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID30805774
PMCPMC6482126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.