ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve with phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with heavy coronary calcification.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) can be noninvasively measured by phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI). Heavy coronary calcification degrades the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis on computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of CFVR measurement with PC-MRI for detecting significant coronary stenoses in patients with heavy coronary calcification. Sixteen patients (71 ± 8 years) with coronary calcium score above 400 who had suspected moderate coronary stenosis (50-69% diameter stenosis) on CT angiography were prospectively studied. The CFVR values, calculated as the ratio of peak flow velocity during hyperemia to the peak flow velocity at rest, were measured using breath-hold PC-MRI with 3 T system, and were compared with the results of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). The mean coronary calcium score was 985 ± 378. CFVR was successfully determined with PC-MRI in 17/18 (94%) vessels. Using a threshold of 1.4 for CFVR, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for detecting ≥ 50% stenosis on QCA was 88% (7/8), 89% (8/9), 88% (7/8), 89% (8/9), respectively. When MRI CFVR measurements was added to CT angiography for the evaluation of coronary stenosis, the positive predictive value was 88% (7/8), while the positive predictive value of CT angiography alone was 44% (8/18). PC-MRI can provide noninvasive detection of altered CFVR caused by significant stenosis in patient. CFVR measurement by PC-MRI is useful for diagnosing physiologically significant coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium score on CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.