Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805684›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2019

Clinical predictors and survival outcome of patients receiving suboptimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single-center experience.

Luca Boeri, Matteo Soligo, Igor Frank, Stephen A Boorjian, R Houston Thompson, Matthew Tollefson, Robert Tarrel, Fernando J Quevedo, John C Cheville, R Jeffrey Karnes

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca BoeriDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. dr.lucaboeri@gmail.com.
Matteo SoligoDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Igor FrankDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Stephen A BoorjianDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R Houston ThompsonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew TollefsonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert TarrelDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Fernando J QuevedoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John C ChevilleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
R Jeffrey KarnesDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the prevalence of and factors' association with receiving suboptimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and its impact on survival outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC).

methodsWe reviewed 1119 patients treated with NAC and/or RC for cT2-cT4N0M0 BC. Patients were segregated into three groups: (i) suboptimal NAC (received < 3 cycles of cisplatin-based NAC or non-cisplatin-based regimen), (ii) optimal NAC and (iii) no NAC. Clinical characteristics were compared among groups. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between clinical variables and the odds of receiving suboptimal NAC. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity score matching was performed. Pathologic outcomes were compared between groups and Cox regression analyses tested the risk factors associated with recurrence, overall (OM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM).

resultsBefore matching, 84/315 (26.6%) patients received a suboptimal NAC regimen. Lower general health status and impaired renal functions were the most significant factors associated with the administration of a suboptimal NAC. After matching, the optimal NAC group achieved higher rates of complete pathological response as compared to the suboptimal group (p = 0.03). Suboptimal NAC (HR 1.77; p = 0.015) and no NAC (HR 1.52; p = 0.03) were both associated with higher risk of recurrence and OM (HR 1.71; p = 0.02 and HR 1.61; p = 0.02) as compared to optimal NAC.

conclusionOne out of four MIBC patients received a suboptimal NAC regimen before RC. Receiving a suboptimal NAC regimen was associated with worse disease recurrence and survival outcomes following surgery, as compared to an optimal NAC regimen.

Indexed as

CystectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBladder cancerCisplatinNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRisk factorsSurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30805684
OpenAlexW2916464261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.