ReviewDer Internist2019
[Treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of digestive endoscopy and surgery in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- [Intensive care in acute pancreatitis (author's transl)].Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie · 1974Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) has an annual incidence of 30-45 per 100,000 inhabitants. In Germany approximately one third of the cases are of biliary or alcoholic origin. The diagnosis is based on the typical epigastric pain with radiation and a threefold increase of lipase or amylase in serum. Imaging procedures only rarely need to be included for the primary diagnostics. An early risk assessment is important to be able to allocate patients with severe AP to surveillance in an intensive care unit (ICU). Elevation of blood urea nitrogen, hematocrit and blood glucose are early predictors of poor outcome.The removal of impacted gall-stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is the only causal treatment of biliary AP, which must be carried out when there are signs of cholangitis and in severe biliary AP. Pain management and early fluid substitution are the most important symptomatic approaches. In the early phase of AP 150-250 ml/h of crystalloid solution should be administered to compensate for the extravasal loss of fluid. In certain cases, the initial fluid requirement might be even higher. In the ICU setting echocardiography and advanced hemodynamic monitoring are available for guidance. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is not recommended in mild AP and it is a matter of debate even in severe AP. Early enteral nutrition has been shown to improve the outcome. Even in cases of fluid collection and necrosis a primary surgery approach should be avoided in favor of a "step-up" procedure with radiologically guided drainage as well as endoscopic and if necessary video-assisted percutaneous retroperitoneal débridement. Surgery remains an option for complications and for infected necrosis which cannot be reached by any other means.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.