Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805630›Full record

ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Appropriate Use of Linear Growth Measures to Assess Impact of Interventions on Child Development and Catch-Up Growth.

Edward A Frongillo, Jef L Leroy, Karin Lapping

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Time to Stop Focusing on Catch-Up Growth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edward A FrongilloDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Jef L LeroyPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Karin LappingAlive & Thrive, FHI 360, Washington, DC.
Family Health International 360 · USInternational Food Policy Research Institute · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linear growth is increasingly used as the sole or primary outcome for evaluating interventions, but impact is often not seen. Sometimes there is interest in whether children catch up to where they otherwise would have been had detrimental conditions not occurred, but the literature is confusing because of claims for evidence of catch-up growth based on inappropriate methods. This article examines the use of linear growth measures to evaluate intervention impact and catch-up. Focus on linear growth as a measure of impact has resulted in a lack of demonstrable intervention effects, evaluations that do not use measures responsive to nutrition-sensitive and integrated interventions, insufficient emphasis on adolescent girls and women before conception and children after the first 1000 d, and insufficient investment in developing other measures. Nutrition interventions may benefit children but may not discernibly affect linear growth deficits in immediate or intermediate periods. Interventions intended to affect one domain may have positive or negative impacts on others. Child nutrition and growth are part of early childhood development; the focus should be on improving conditions in which children grow and develop throughout childhood and adolescence because poor conditions in a population affect all children. To assess the impact of nutrition interventions, it is important to use a broad set of measures and indicators of outcomes and immediate and underlying determinants. The 4 criteria for demonstrating catch-up in growth, which are much more stringent than those for demonstrating intervention impact, require demonstration of the following: 1) an inhibiting condition and 2) reduced velocity during 1 period, 3) followed by alleviation of or compensation for the inhibiting condition, and 4) higher-than-normal velocity during a subsequent period. Partial catch-up growth is sometimes possible when constraints are removed, but whether it is beneficial to the child is not clear. Research is needed to develop, refine, and validate measures and indicators for the purposes intended.

Indexed as

Body HeightChild DevelopmentAdolescentChildChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild, PreschoolFemaleGrowth ChartsGrowth DisordersHumansInfantMaleOutcome Assessment, Health Carecatch-up growthchild developmentchildrenheightlengthlinear growthmeasuresstunting

Identifiers

PMID30805630
PMCPMC6520037
OpenAlexW2916696193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.