ArticleAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019
Appropriate Use of Linear Growth Measures to Assess Impact of Interventions on Child Development and Catch-Up Growth.
Article in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying child growth effects using height-age instead of height-for-age z-scores in a meta-analysis of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement trials.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of long-term oral nutritional supplementation with dietary counseling on growth, body composition and bone mineralization in children with or at risk for undernutrition: a randomized controlled trial.Nutrition journal · 2025Trial
- A Fortified Food Can Be Replaced by Micronutrient Supplements for Distribution in a Mexican Social Protection Program Based on Results of a Cluster-Randomized Trial and Costing Analysis.The Journal of nutrition · 2019Trial
- Stunting Reversal versus Regression to the Mean in Epidemiological Studies of Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Time to Stop Focusing on Catch-Up Growth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Association between size at birth, rapid weight gain in infancy, and overweight status among Palestinian refugees under 5 years old: a retrospective cohort study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Validating self-reported exclusive breastfeeding in Eswatini using stable isotope techniques.PloS one · 2026Article
- Determinants of height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) among Ethiopian children aged 0-59 months: a multilevel mixed-effects analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Should a single growth standard be used to judge the nutritional status of children under age 5 years globally: Yes.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Oral nutritional supplementation with dietary counseling improves linear catch-up growth and health outcomes in children with or at risk of undernutrition: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Examining the burden and relationship between stunting and wasting among Timor-Leste under five rural children.PloS one · 2024Article
- Time-trend analysis (2006 to 2019) of nutritional indicators among Brazilian pre-school children: making progress on child health inequalities.Cadernos de saude publica · 2023Article
- Study of the importance of protein needs for catch-up growth in Indonesian stunted children: a narrative review.SAGE open medicine · 2023Review
- Preschool child growth attainment and velocity during an agriculture intervention in rural Panama may be diminished by soil-transmitted helminths.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Changes in Child Undernutrition and Overweight in India From 2006 to 2021: An Ecological Analysis of 36 States.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Children with Esophageal Atresia: Potential Benefits on the Anthropometric Parameters.Pediatric reports · 2022Article
- Using height-adjusted stunting prevalence will fail disadvantaged children worldwide.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Article
- Monthly measurement of child lengths between 6 and 27 months of age in Burkina Faso reveals both chronic and episodic growth faltering.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linear growth is increasingly used as the sole or primary outcome for evaluating interventions, but impact is often not seen. Sometimes there is interest in whether children catch up to where they otherwise would have been had detrimental conditions not occurred, but the literature is confusing because of claims for evidence of catch-up growth based on inappropriate methods. This article examines the use of linear growth measures to evaluate intervention impact and catch-up. Focus on linear growth as a measure of impact has resulted in a lack of demonstrable intervention effects, evaluations that do not use measures responsive to nutrition-sensitive and integrated interventions, insufficient emphasis on adolescent girls and women before conception and children after the first 1000 d, and insufficient investment in developing other measures. Nutrition interventions may benefit children but may not discernibly affect linear growth deficits in immediate or intermediate periods. Interventions intended to affect one domain may have positive or negative impacts on others. Child nutrition and growth are part of early childhood development; the focus should be on improving conditions in which children grow and develop throughout childhood and adolescence because poor conditions in a population affect all children. To assess the impact of nutrition interventions, it is important to use a broad set of measures and indicators of outcomes and immediate and underlying determinants. The 4 criteria for demonstrating catch-up in growth, which are much more stringent than those for demonstrating intervention impact, require demonstration of the following: 1) an inhibiting condition and 2) reduced velocity during 1 period, 3) followed by alleviation of or compensation for the inhibiting condition, and 4) higher-than-normal velocity during a subsequent period. Partial catch-up growth is sometimes possible when constraints are removed, but whether it is beneficial to the child is not clear. Research is needed to develop, refine, and validate measures and indicators for the purposes intended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.