Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805627›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2019

High baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels indicate adverse outcome after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Sven H Loosen, Frank Tacke, Niklas Püthe, Marcel Binneboesel, Georg Wiltberger, Patrick H Alizai, Jakob N Kather, Pia Paffenholz, Thomas Ritz, Alexander Koch and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Human antibody VFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Advanced iron oxide nanotheranostics for multimodal and precision treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sven H LoosenDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Frank TackeDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Niklas PütheDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Marcel BinneboeselDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Georg WiltbergerDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Patrick H AlizaiDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob N KatherDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Pia PaffenholzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße, Germany.
Thomas RitzInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Alexander KochDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Frank BergmannInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian TrautweinDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Thomas LongerichInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Christoph RoderburgDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Ulf P NeumannDepartment of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Tom LueddeDepartment of Medicine III, Hepatology and Hepatobiliary Oncology, Pauwelsstrasse, Aachen, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DERWTH Aachen University · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative therapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), an aggressive malignancy with a very limited 5-year survival rate. However, even after complete tumor resection, many patients are still facing an unfavorable prognosis underlining the need for better preoperative stratification algorithms. Here, we explored the role of the secreted glycoprotein soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) as a novel circulating biomarker for patients undergoing resection of PDAC. Serum levels of suPAR were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in an exploratory as well as a validation cohort comprising a total of 127 PDAC patients and 75 healthy controls. Correlating with a cytoplasmic immunohistochemical expression of uPAR in PDAC tumor cells, serum levels of suPAR were significantly elevated in PDAC patients compared to healthy controls and patient with PDAC precursor lesions. Importantly, patients with high preoperative suPAR levels above a calculated cutoff value of 5.956 ng/ml showed a significantly reduced overall survival after tumor resection. The prognostic role of suPAR was further corroborated by uni- and multivariate Cox-regression analyses including parameters of systemic inflammation, liver and kidney function as well as clinico-pathological patients' characteristics. Moreover, high baseline suPAR levels identified those patients particularly susceptible to acute kidney injury and surgical complications after surgery. In conclusion, our data suggest that circulating suPAR represents a novel prognostic marker in PDAC patients undergoing tumor resection that might be a useful addition to existing preoperative stratification algorithms for identifying patients that particularly benefit from extended tumor resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsBiomarkers, TumorPLAUR protein, humanReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID30805627
PMCPMC6735890
OpenAlexW2916028550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.