Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805447›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine

Prevention of the anaemia of prematurity.

Serdar Alan, Saadet Arsan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serdar AlanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Yuksek Ihtisas University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Saadet ArsanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in neonatal and perinatal medicine, extremely low birth weight infants (ELBW) are at high risk of developing anaemia of prematurity (AOP) requiring packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. The benefit of transfusing allogenic RBCs for AOP is a controversial issue, except for disturbances in tissue oxygenation. Although the role of erythropoietin (EPO) in the pathophysiology of AOP is well known, neither early nor late recombinant human EPO therapy alters the number or volume of RBC transfusions. It is also known that one-half of the feto-placental blood volume remains outside the newborn infant's circulation at 30 weeks of gestation if the umbilical cord is clamped immediately. Delayed cord clamping (DCC) and umbilical cord milking (UCM) are the main methods for enhancing placental transfusion. The basic principle of these approaches depends on providing high haemoglobin (Hb) levels to premature infants in the delivery room. The enhancement of placental transfusion clearly results in higher Hb levels at birth, reducing the need for RBC transfusions as well as creating a better haemodynamic status during the initial hours of life. To date, enhancement of placental transfusion in the delivery room by either DCC or UCM seems to be the best preventive measure for AOP. Yet, studies on the associated neurodevelopmental outcomes are insufficient to reach a conclusion. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, treatment and preventative strategies of anaemia of prematurity in light of the current literature.

Indexed as

Anaemia of prematurityDelayed cord clampingPlacental transfusionUmbilical cord milking

Identifiers

PMID30805447
PMCPMC6372412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.