Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805417›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2019

Patient Satisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Short-Term Results in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis.

Mohammadreza Minator Sajjadi, Sohrab Keyhani, Seyyed Morteza Kazemi, Behzad Hanafizadeh, Adel Ebrahimpour, Mohammad Banasiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survival, functional outcome and satisfaction of first revision total knee arthroplasty at a mean eleven-year follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammadreza Minator SajjadiTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sohrab KeyhaniTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyyed Morteza KazemiTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Behzad HanafizadehTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Adel EbrahimpourTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad BanasiriTaleghani hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the obvious differences in the natural course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA), different functional outcomes might be expected after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in these distinct patients. Although several studies have reported the objective outcome of TKA in RA and OA patients, few studies have compared post-operative patient-satisfaction levels.

methodsIn this clinical cohort study 171 patients (RA: n=33, OA: n=138) who underwent TKA with posterior stabilizing knee prosthesis were included. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were used to evaluate and compare patients' satisfaction 6 and 12 months after TKA relative to their preoperative state and to make an assessment between two groups.

resultsBoth of patient-reported scoring systems showed a statistically significant improvement for OA and RA patients at 6 and 12 months after surgery, relative to their preoperative scores. The results of the OKS and KOOS did not show statistically significant improvement from 6 to 12 months n RA patients. Unlike RA group, OKS and KOOS revealed further improvement between 6 and 12 months for the osteoarthritic patients.

conclusionOA patients had continuous improvement in their satisfaction in the first year after TKA with a gentle upward curve. In contrast, in RA patients, recovery was faster and greater in the first six months after surgery and slowed down in the second six months. Patient-reported outcome scores were not significantly different between two groups at the end of the first year.

Indexed as

Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scoreOsteoarthritisOxford knee scoreRheumatoid arthritisSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID30805417
PMCPMC6372268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.