ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2019
Incidence, Management, and Cost of Complications After Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Foraminal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Value Proposition for Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression: Defining Its Scope and Limitations.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Lumbar Spinal Endoscopy: Mature, Durable, and Established-Not Investigational.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effects of incremental resection of the lumbar superior articular process using an endoscopic approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Comparison of a progressive bone drilling system and a visualized reaming system in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a comparative study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery : Its Roles and Limitations.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- Short-term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Transforaminal Full-endoscopic Pars Crisscross Decompression of the Exiting Nerve Root under Local Anesthesia in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2025Article
- Endoscopic transfacet Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Technical Note, Illustrative Clinical Series, and Surgeon Survey Regarding Post-Decompression Instability.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Percutaneous Spinal Endoscopic YESS Technique in Adjacent Segmental Disease Without Severe Instability After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Case Series.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- A narrative review of endoscopic spine surgery: history, indications, uses, and future directions.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2024Review
- Evolution, Current Trends, and Latest Advances of Endoscopic Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Advances and Challenges of Endoscopic Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis: clinical outcomes and factors influencing unsatisfactory outcomes.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- [Research progress of different minimally invasive spinal decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Review
- Durotomy- and Irrigation-Related Serious Adverse Events During Spinal Endoscopy: Illustrative Case Series and International Surgeon Survey.International journal of spine surgery · 2023Article
- Personalized Interventional Surgery of the Lumbar Spine: A Perspective on Minimally Invasive and Neuroendoscopic Decompression for Spinal Stenosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The Role and Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Article
- Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Clinical Consequences of Incidental Durotomy during Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Surgery in Relation to Intraoperative Epidural Pressure Measurements.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to analyze incidence, estimate cost savings, and evaluate best management practices of complications resulting from outpatient transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery for lumbar foraminal and lateral recess stenosis performed in an ambulatory surgery center.
backgroundEndoscopic spinal surgery is gaining popularity for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations. Recent advances in surgical techniques allow for endoscopically assisted bony decompression for neurogenic claudication symptoms due to spinal stenosis. Postoperative complications from dural tears, recurrent disc herniations, nerve root injuries, foot drop, and facet and pedicle fractures, and postoperative sequelae such as dysesthetic leg pain and infiltration of the surgical access and spinal canal with irrigation fluid causing spinal headaches and painful wound swelling, as well as failure to cure, have been reported.
methodsA retrospective study of 1839 consecutive patients with an average mean follow up of 33 months (range: 24 to 85 months) that underwent transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery at 2076 levels between 2006 and 2015 was conducted to analyze incidence, and estimate the cost savings of postoperative adverse events following endoscopic foraminotomy and microdiscectomy. Complications were stratified using Dindo's 7-category grading system, distinguishing them from procedure-inherent sequelae as well as failure to cure. Only patients with unilateral radiculopathy due to either herniated disc or lateral recess stenosis were included in this study. Preoperatively, disc migration was graded by direction and distance from the disc space according to Lee's radiologic 4-zone classification. The type of disc herniation was classified either as contained or extruded. Contained herniations were further subclassified as disc protrusions versus disc bulges. In addition, the preoperative disc height was recorded. Bony spinal foraminal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans into mild, moderate, and severe by dividing the lumbar neuroforamen into 3 zones: (1) entry zone, (2) midzone, and (3) exit zone. Surgical outcomes were classified according to the Macnab criteria. In addition, reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores were assessed.
resultsAccording to the Macnab criteria, excellent and good results were obtained in 82.2% of patients with extruded disc fragment (331/1839). In this group, the mean VAS score decreased from 5.9 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 2.4 ± 1.8 at final follow-up (
conclusionsComplications after outpatient transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery with respect to reherniation, wound infections, durotomy, and nerve root injury are approximately 1 magnitude lower than equivalent reported complication rates with microdiscectomy while delivering comparable clinical outcomes and lower readmission rates to an emergency room or hospital. Postoperative sequelae are typically self-limiting and successfully managed with supportive care measures. Significant cost savings are realized due to a considerably lower rate of decompensated postoperative medical problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.