Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805147›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Effect of water temperature and fish biomass on environmental DNA shedding, degradation, and size distribution.

Toshiaki Jo, Hiroaki Murakami, Satoshi Yamamoto, Reiji Masuda, Toshifumi Minamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observation Bias in Metabarcoding.Molecular ecology resources · 2025
    Article
  14. Ancient environmental DNA indicates limited human impact on marine biodiversity in pre-industrial Iceland.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Toshiaki JoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment Kobe University Kobe City Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-9360
Hiroaki MurakamiMaizuru Fisheries Research Station Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Satoshi YamamotoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment Kobe University Kobe City Japan.
Reiji MasudaMaizuru Fisheries Research Station Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Toshifumi MinamotoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment Kobe University Kobe City Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5379-1622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis has successfully detected organisms in various aquatic environments. However, there is little basic information on eDNA, including the eDNA shedding and degradation processes. This study focused on water temperature and fish biomass and showed that eDNA shedding, degradation, and size distribution varied depending on water temperature and fish biomass. The tank experiments consisted of four temperature levels and three fish biomass levels. The total eDNA and size-fractioned eDNA from Japanese Jack Mackerels (

Indexed as

decay rateenvironmental DNAfish biomassJapanese Jack Mackerel (Trachurus japonicus)quantitative real‐time PCRshedding ratesize distributionwater temperature

Identifiers

PMID30805147
PMCPMC6374661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.