Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805124›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2019

Update of the therapeutic planning of irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal treatment. A literature review.

Ilaria Prada, Pedro Micó-Muñoz, Teresa Giner-Lluesma, Pablo Micó-Martínez, Susana Muwaquet-Rodríguez, Alberto Albero-Monteagudo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antibacterial effect of 940 nm diode laser onDental research journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilaria PradaLicensed Dentist at Universidad Europea de Valencia, España.
Pedro Micó-MuñozEndodontic and restorative dentistry Titular Professor, Universidad Europea de Valencia, España.
Teresa Giner-LluesmaEndodontic and restorative dentistry Associate Professor, Universidad Europea de Valencia, España.
Pablo Micó-MartínezLicensed Dentist at Universidad Europea de Valencia. Periodontology and Osteointegration Master at Universidad de Valencia, España.
Susana Muwaquet-RodríguezEndodontic and restorative dentistry Associate Professor, Universidad Europea de Valencia, España.
Alberto Albero-MonteagudoEndodontic and restorative dentistry Associate Professor, Universidad Europea de Valencia, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of endodontic treatment derives from the complete elimination of microorganisms capable of causing an intraradicular or extraradicular infection. To achieve a more effective eradication of these microorganisms, endodontic instrumentation must always be implemented with abundant irrigation, which has to achieve chemical, mechanical and biological effects. The irrigators most used today are NaOCl, CHX and EDTA, released into the ducts through different techniques such as syringe, manual agitation, positive or negative apical pressure, sonic or ultrasonic activation, PIPS and PDT. The objective of this review is to update the different irrigating solutions and intracanal disinfection drugs, as well as to establish an irrigation protocol in the endodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsSystematic search of scientific articles in the databases PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar, with the following keywords Endodontic, Infection, Failure, Irrigation, Retreatment and Irrigation protocol. The exclusion criteria were "case report" articles and articles with a publication date prior to 2000.

results48 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Comparing the different articles it can be seen that the NaOCl is the "gold standard" in terms of immediate antimicrobial efficacy, followed by the CHX that has a long-term antibacterial effect. As an intra-conductive drug it is advisable to use the combination of Ca(OH)2 with CPMC.

conclusionsThe most adequate irrigation protocol consists of using 2.5% NaOCl activated with ultrasound followed by a final wash with 7% MA or 0.2% CTR combined with 2% CHX.

Identifiers

PMID30805124
PMCPMC6383907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.