ReviewJournal of arrhythmia2019
Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice.
Review in Journal of arrhythmia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Trial
- Article
- AI-Enabled Sensor Technologies for Remote Arrhythmic Monitoring in High-Risk Cardiomyopathy Genotypes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding the Role of Implantable Loop Recorders: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Yields Across Seven Clinical Indications in 388 Real-World Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An Implantable Loop Recorder in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: The Importance of Drug Treatment in Predicting Pacemaker Requirement.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- The Arrhythmogenic Spectrum of Mitral Valve Disease: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Surgical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Electrostatically actuated MEMS resonators for magnetic and electric field sensing: a review.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- The Arrhythmic Burden of Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comprehensive Review.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026Review
- Immune-compatible designs of semiconducting polymers for bioelectronics with suppressed foreign-body response.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Palpitations: A Practical Approach.Cureus · 2025Review
- Technological Advances and Medical Applications of Implantable Electronic Devices: From the Heart, Brain, and Skin to Gastrointestinal Organs.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Application of insertable cardiac monitors in the real world: an observational cohort study in China.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Clinical Utility of the 4S-AF Scheme in Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Electrocardiogram Characteristics of Two Commercially Available Implantable Loop Monitors: Impact of These Characteristics in the Correct Adjudication of Recorded Events and Minimized Undersensing and Oversensing of Events.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- An implantable system for opioid safety.Device · 2024Article
- A Narrowband IoT Personal Sensor for Long-Term Heart Rate Monitoring and Atrial Fibrillation Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing the efficacy of machine learning algorithms for syncope classification: A systematic review.MethodsX · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Modeling to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Repositioning of the Insertable Cardiac Monitor Through the Same Incision to Avoid T-wave Oversensing.Cureus · 2024Article
- A combination of logical judging circuit and water-resistant ultrathin film PEDOT: PSS electrode for noninvasive ECG measurement.Discover nano · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implantable loop recorder (ILR), also known as insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is a subcutaneous device used for diagnosing heart rhythm disorders. These devices have been strongly improved and miniaturized during the last years showing several reliable features along with the availability of remote monitoring which improves the diagnostic timing and the follow-up strategy with a potential reduction of costs for health care. The recent advent of injectable ILRs makes the procedure even easier and more tolerated by patients. ILR allows the investigation of unexplained recurrent syncope with uncertain diagnosis, revealing a possible relationship with cardiac arrhythmias. In addition, it has recently been equipped with sophisticated algorithms able to detect atrial fibrillation episodes. This new opportunity may provide to the physicians systematic heart rhythm screening with possible effects on patient antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant therapy management. The use of such devices will surely increase, since they may be helpful to diagnose a wide range of disorders and pathologies. Indeed, further studies should be performed in order to identify all the potentialities of these tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.