Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30805020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2019

The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?

J William O Ballard, Laura A B Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ancient genomes reveal over two thousand years of dingo population structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Australasian dingo archetype:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Before Azaria: A Historical Perspective on Dingo Attacks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Social Lives of Free-Ranging Cats.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. What the dingo says about dog domestication.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J William O Ballard1School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-6003
Laura A B Wilson2School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Australian dingo continues to cause debate amongst Aboriginal people, pastoralists, scientists and the government in Australia. A lingering controversy is whether the dingo has been tamed and has now reverted to its ancestral wild state or whether its ancestors were domesticated and it now resides on the continent as a feral dog. The goal of this article is to place the discussion onto a theoretical framework, highlight what is currently known about dingo origins and taxonomy and then make a series of experimentally testable organismal, cellular and biochemical predictions that we propose can focus future research. DISCUSSION: We consider a canid that has been unconsciously selected as a

conclusionsWestern Australian Government policy is currently being revised to allow the widespread killing of the Australian dingo. These policies are based on an incomplete understanding of the evolutionary history of the canid and assume the dingo is feralized. However, accumulated evidence does not definitively show that the dingo was ever domesticated and additional focused research is required. We suggest that incorporating ancient DNA data into the debate concerning dingo origins will be pivotal to understanding the evolutionary history of the canid. Further, we advocate that future morphological, behavioural and genetic studies should focus on including genetically pure Alpine and Desert dingoes and not dingo-dog hybrids. Finally, we propose that future studies critically examine genes under selection in the dingo and employ the genome from a wild canid for comparison.

Indexed as

Artificial selectionCanidDomesticationHybridizationUnconscious selection

Identifiers

PMID30805020
PMCPMC6373076
OpenAlexW2940378493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.