Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804896›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Benefits and Inputs From Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Bacteriocins as Alternatives to Antibiotic Growth Promoters During Food-Animal Production.

Nuria Vieco-Saiz, Yanath Belguesmia, Ruth Raspoet, Eric Auclair, Frédérique Gancel, Isabelle Kempf, Djamel Drider

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed
50.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 579 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Probiotics Cancer Interaction, Prevention, and Therapy.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Antibacterial Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nuria Vieco-SaizEA7394-ICV, Institut Charles Viollette, Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Yanath BelguesmiaEA7394-ICV, Institut Charles Viollette, Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Ruth RaspoetPhileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Eric AuclairPhileo Lesaffre Animal Care, Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Frédérique GancelEA7394-ICV, Institut Charles Viollette, Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Isabelle KempfLaboratoire de Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Ploufragan, France.
Djamel DriderEA7394-ICV, Institut Charles Viollette, Université de Lille, Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France.
Université de Lille · FRLesaffre (France) · FRAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRInstitut Charles Viollette · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to antibiotics is escalating and threatening humans and animals worldwide. Different countries have legislated or promoted the ban of antibiotics as growth promoters in livestock and aquaculture to reduce this phenomenon. Therefore, to improve animal growth and reproduction performance and to control multiple bacterial infections, there is a potential to use probiotics as non-antibiotic growth promoters. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) offer various advantages as potential probiotics and can be considered as alternatives to antibiotics during food-animal production. LAB are safe microorganisms with abilities to produce different inhibitory compounds such as bacteriocins, organic acids as lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, and carbon dioxide. LAB can inhibit harmful microorganisms with their arsenal, or through competitive exclusion mechanism based on competition for binding sites and nutrients. LAB endowed with specific enzymatic functions (amylase, protease…) can improve nutrients acquisition as well as animal immune system stimulation. This review aimed at underlining the benefits and inputs from LAB as potential alternatives to antibiotics in poultry, pigs, ruminants, and aquaculture production.

Indexed as

animal healthantibiotic alternativesimmunitylactic acid bacteriamicrobiotaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID30804896
PMCPMC6378274
OpenAlexW2912580138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.