Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804685›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Diagnostic accuracy of HIV test kits, Genscreen Ultra and Bioelisa.

Saro Abdella Abrahim, Mulu Girma, Abebe Habteselassie, Nigussie Gezahegn, Altaye Feleke, Tezera Moshago Berheto, Minilik Demissie, Wudnesh Belete, Tekalign Deressa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saro Abdella AbrahimHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Mulu GirmaHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Abebe HabteselassieHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Nigussie GezahegnHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Altaye FelekeHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Tezera Moshago BerhetoHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Minilik DemissieHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Wudnesh BeleteHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Tekalign DeressaHIV/TB Research and Reference Laboratory Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, helen_saro@yahoo.com.
Ethiopian Public Health Institute · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenetic diversities in different countries affect the performance of HIV test kits. Therefore, WHO recommends evaluation of every HIV test kit in countries' context before its use. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of Genscreen ULTRA HIV Ag-Ab and Bioelisa. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study had used 400 characterized plasma samples obtained from CDC Atlanta bio-bank derived from Africa, USA, and Thailand.

resultsDiagnostic performance of both test kits under evaluation was assessed at 95% CI. Genscreen ULTRA HIV Ag-Ab had sensitivity and negative predictive value of 99.5% [95% CI, 97.2-99.9] and the specificity and positive predictive value of 98.5% [95% CI, 95.7-99.7]. Bioelisa HIV test kit had exhibited sensitivity and negative predictive value of 99% [95% CI, 96.4-99.7] and specificity and positive predictive value of 98.5% [95% CI, 95.7-99.7]. Both test kits were able to detect almost all samples with HIV-2, dual infections, and seroconversion.

conclusionBoth the test kits were highly sensitive and specific in detecting HIV. However, there are still few samples containing HIV antibody which were not identified by both kits. Therefore, additional screening measures should be done in using these assays for blood transfusion and organ transplantation. In addition, the study can be used as a reference by other African countries.

Indexed as

ELISApositive predictivesensitivityspecificityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID30804685
PMCPMC6375533
OpenAlexW2914955364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.