Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804678›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental gastroenterology2019

Beneficial effects of

Chloe Terciolo, Michel Dapoigny, Frederic Andre

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Application ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Collagen Peptides andFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Probiotics and the intestinal tight junction barrier function.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Gut Microbiome and Ferroptosis in MAFLD.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chloe TercioloINRA, UMR 1331 Toxalim, Research Center in Food Toxicology, F-31027 Toulouse, France, chloe.terciolo@gmail.com.
Michel DapoignyMédecine Digestive, CHU Estaing, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM UMR 1107, Neuro-Dol, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Frederic AndreCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille Université and Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Parc scientifique et technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France.
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille · FRInserm · FRPhysiopathologie et pharmacologie de la douleur et de la migraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal barrier defects lead to "leaky gut syndrome", defined as an increase in intestinal permeability that allows the passage of luminal content into intestinal tissue and the bloodstream. Such a compromised intestinal barrier is the main factor underlying the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, but also commonly occurs in various systemic diseases such as viral infections and metabolic syndrome. The non-pathogenic yeast

Indexed as

apical junctional complexintestinal barrier functionintestinal permeabilityleaky gut syndromeSaccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745tight junctions

Identifiers

PMID30804678
PMCPMC6375115
OpenAlexW2914697859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.