Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804608›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Quantification of visceral adipose tissue by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: reproducibility and accuracy.

Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori, Edoardo Savarino, Giovanni Mauri, Enzo Silvestri, Maurizio Cariati, Francesco Sardanelli, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lorenzo Carlo PescatoriUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8055-4801
Edoardo SavarinoUniversità di Padova, Padova, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-2894
Giovanni MauriIstituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-2692
Enzo SilvestriOspedale Evangelico Internazionale, Genova, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1566-9722
Maurizio CariatiASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Presidio San Carlo Borromeo, Milano, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2437-6702
Francesco SardanelliUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427
Luca Maria SconfienzaUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0759-8431
University of Milan · ITAOL (United States) · USEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility of quantifying visceral adipose tissue (VAT) on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, using freeware, as well as calculating intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe quantified VAT in patients who underwent abdominal CT and MRI at our institution between 2010 and 2015, with a maximum of three months between the two examinations. A slice acquired at the level of the umbilicus was selected. Segmentation was performed with the region growing algorithm of the freeware employed. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were evaluated, as was the accuracy of MRI in relation to that of CT.

resultsThirty-one patients (14 males and 17 females; mean age of 57 ± 15 years) underwent CT and MRI (mean interval between the examinations, 28 ± 12 days). The interobserver reproducibility was 82% for CT (bias = 1.52 cm

conclusionThe program employed can be used in order to quantify VAT on CT, T1-weighted MRI, and T2-weighted MRI scans. Overall, the accuracy of MRI (in comparison with that of CT) appears to be high, as do intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility. However, the quantification of VAT seems to be less reproducible in T1-weighted sequences.

Indexed as

Image processing, computer-assisted/methodsIntra-abdominal fatMagnetic resonance imagingReproducibility of resultsTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID30804608
PMCPMC6383529
OpenAlexW2913898697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.