Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804559›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2019

Genome-wide stability of the DNA replication program in single mammalian cells.

Saori Takahashi, Hisashi Miura, Takahiro Shibata, Koji Nagao, Katsuzumi Okumura, Masato Ogata, Chikashi Obuse, Shin-Ichiro Takebayashi, Ichiro Hiratani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi-Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saori Takahashi *Laboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-3656
Hisashi Miura *Laboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-776X
Takahiro Shibata *Department of Biochemistry and Proteomics, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.
Koji NagaoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1418-6988
Katsuzumi OkumuraLaboratory of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.
Masato OgataDepartment of Biochemistry and Proteomics, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.
Chikashi ObuseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro TakebayashiDepartment of Biochemistry and Proteomics, Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan. stake@doc.medic.mie-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1968-9800
Ichiro HirataniLaboratory for Developmental Epigenetics, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe, Japan. ichiro.hiratani@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-3540
Mie University · JPRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we report a single-cell DNA replication sequencing method, scRepli-seq, a genome-wide methodology that measures copy number differences between replicated and unreplicated DNA. Using scRepli-seq, we demonstrate that replication-domain organization is conserved among individual mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Differentiated mESCs exhibited distinct profiles, which were also conserved among cells. Haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq revealed similar replication profiles of homologous autosomes, while the inactive X chromosome was clearly replicated later than its active counterpart. However, a small degree of cell-to-cell replication-timing heterogeneity was present, which was smallest at the beginning and the end of S phase. In addition, developmentally regulated domains were found to deviate from others and showed a higher degree of heterogeneity, thus suggesting a link to developmental plasticity. Moreover, allelic expression imbalance was found to strongly associate with replication-timing asynchrony. Our results form a foundation for single-cell-level understanding of DNA replication regulation and provide insights into three-dimensional genome organization.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineDNADNA Copy Number VariationsDNA ReplicationDNA Replication TimingEmbryonic Stem CellsGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomic InstabilityHumansMammalsMiceMouse Embryonic Stem CellsS PhaseDNA

Identifiers

PMID30804559
OpenAlexW2949692914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.