Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804399›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

The effects of a single session of chiropractic care on strength, cortical drive, and spinal excitability in stroke patients.

Kelly Holt, Imran Khan Niazi, Rasmus Wiberg Nedergaard, Jens Duehr, Imran Amjad, Muhammad Shafique, Muhammad Nabeel Anwar, Harrison Ndetan, Kemal S Turker, Heidi Haavik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06534931 (Effects of a High Velocity Low Amplitude Mid-Thoracic Spinal Segment Manipulation on the Force Output of the Hip Adductors and Extensors and the Latissimus Dorsi in Healthy Individuals With Unilateral Hip Adductor Weakness), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06534931 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of a High Velocity Low Amplitude Mid-Thoracic Spinal Segment Manipulation on the Force Output of the Hip Adductors and Extensors and the Latissimus Dorsi in Healthy Individuals With Unilateral Hip Adductor Weakness

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of New EnglandRan2021 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsMuscle WeaknessArmsHigh velocity low amplitude thoracic spine manipulation, Sham
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Kelly HoltCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Rasmus Wiberg NedergaardCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jens DuehrCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand.
Imran AmjadRiphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShafiqueRiphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Nabeel AnwarNational University of Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Harrison NdetanUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Tylers, Texas, USA.
Kemal S TurkerSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Heidi HaavikCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand. heidi.haavik@nzchiro.co.nz.
New Zealand College of Chiropractic · NZRiphah International University · PKKoç University · TRUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether a single session of chiropractic care could increase strength in weak plantar flexor muscles in chronic stroke patients. Maximum voluntary contractions (strength) of the plantar flexors, soleus evoked V-waves (cortical drive), and H-reflexes were recorded in 12 chronic stroke patients, with plantar flexor muscle weakness, using a randomized controlled crossover design. Outcomes were assessed pre and post a chiropractic care intervention and a passive movement control. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to asses within and between group differences. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Following the chiropractic care intervention there was a significant increase in strength (F (1,11) = 14.49, p = 0.002; avg 64.2 ± 77.7%) and V-wave/Mmax ratio (F(1,11) = 9.67, p = 0.009; avg 54.0 ± 65.2%) compared to the control intervention. There was a significant strength decrease of 26.4 ± 15.5% (p = 0.001) after the control intervention. There were no other significant differences. Plantar flexor muscle strength increased in chronic stroke patients after a single session of chiropractic care. An increase in V-wave amplitude combined with no significant changes in H-reflex parameters suggests this increased strength is likely modulated at a supraspinal level. Further research is required to investigate the longer term and potential functional effects of chiropractic care in stroke recovery.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesElectromyographyFemaleH-ReflexHumansMaleManipulation, ChiropracticMiddle AgedMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscle WeaknessOutcome Assessment, Health CareStroke

Identifiers

PMID30804399
PMCPMC6389925
OpenAlexW2917456659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.