Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804258›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2019

Bioinformatics analyses of differentially expressed genes associated with spinal cord injury: A microarray-based analysis in a mouse model.

Lei Guo, Jing Lv, Yun-Fei Huang, Ding-Jun Hao, Ji-Jun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel insights into the nervous system affected by prolonged hyperglycemia.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Valproic Acid: A Potential Therapeutic for Spinal Cord Injury.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei GuoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Jing LvDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yun-Fei HuangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Ding-Jun HaoDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Ji-Jun LiuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNXi'an Honghui Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene spectrum analysis has shown that gene expression and signaling pathways change dramatically after spinal cord injury, which may affect the microenvironment of the damaged site. Microarray analysis provides a new opportunity for investigating diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of spinal cord injury. However, differentially expressed genes are not consistent among studies, and many key genes and signaling pathways have not yet been accurately studied. GSE5296 was retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus DataSet. Differentially expressed genes were obtained using R/Bioconductor software (expression changed at least two-fold; P < 0.05). Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery was used for functional annotation of differentially expressed genes and Animal Transcription Factor Database for predicting potential transcription factors. The resulting transcription regulatory protein interaction network was mapped to screen representative genes and investigate their diagnostic and therapeutic value for disease. In total, this study identified 109 genes that were upregulated and 30 that were downregulated at 0.5, 4, and 24 hours, and 3, 7, and 28 days after spinal cord injury. The number of downregulated genes was smaller than the number of upregulated genes at each time point. Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery analysis found that many inflammation-related pathways were upregulated in injured spinal cord. Additionally, expression levels of these inflammation-related genes were maintained for at least 28 days. Moreover, 399 regulation modes and 77 nodes were shown in the protein-protein interaction network of upregulated differentially expressed genes. Among the 10 upregulated differentially expressed genes with the highest degrees of distribution, six genes were transcription factors. Among these transcription factors, ATF3 showed the greatest change. ATF3 was upregulated within 30 minutes, and its expression levels remained high at 28 days after spinal cord injury. These key genes screened by bioinformatics tools can be used as biological markers to diagnose diseases and provide a reference for identifying therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

nerve regeneration; spinal cord injury; differentially expressed genes; bioinformatics analyses; Database for AnnotationVisualization and Integrated Discovery analysis; inflammation; Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway; microarray; transcription factors; neural regeneration

Identifiers

PMID30804258
PMCPMC6425843
OpenAlexW2917048357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.