Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804253›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2019

GPER agonist G1 suppresses neuronal apoptosis mediated by endoplasmic reticulum stress after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Zi-Wei Han, Yue-Chen Chang, Ying Zhou, Hang Zhang, Long Chen, Yang Zhang, Jun-Qiang Si, Li Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zi-Wei HanDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yue-Chen ChangDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Hang ZhangKey Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Affiliated Teng Zhou Central People's Hospital, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong Province, China.
Long ChenDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Jun-Qiang SiDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Li LiDepartment of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University; Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Endemic and Ethnic Disease, Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Department of Physiology, Jiaxing College of Medicine, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have confirmed a strong association between activation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway and cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In this study, three key proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway (glucose-regulated protein 78, caspase-12, and C/EBP homologous protein) were selected to examine the potential mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum stress in the neuroprotective effect of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received ovariectomy (OVX), and then cerebral I/R rat models (OVX + I/R) were established by middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immediately after I/R, rat models were injected with 100 μg/kg E2 (OVX + I/R + E2), or 100 μg/kg G protein-coupled estrogen receptor agonist G1 (OVX + I/R + G1) in the lateral ventricle. Longa scoring was used to detect neurobehavioral changes in each group. Infarct volumes were measured by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Morphological changes in neurons were observed by Nissl staining. Terminal dexynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end-labeling staining revealed that compared with the OVX + I/R group, neurological function was remarkably improved, infarct volume was reduced, number of normal Nissl bodies was dramatically increased, and number of apoptotic neurons in the hippocampus was decreased after E2 and G1 intervention. To detect the expression and distribution of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, caspase-12 distribution and expression were detected by immunofluorescence, and mRNA and protein levels of glucose-regulated protein 78, caspase-12, and C/EBP homologous protein were determined by polymerase chain reaction and western blot assay. The results showed that compared with the OVX + I/R group, E2 and G1 treatment obviously decreased mRNA and protein expression levels of glucose-regulated protein 78, C/EBP homologous protein, and caspase-12. However, the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor antagonist G15 (OVX + I/R + E2 + G15) could eliminate the effect of E2 on cerebral I/R injury. These results confirm that E2 and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor can inhibit the expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related proteins and neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampus, thereby improving dysfunction caused by cerebral I/R injury. Every experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, China (approval No. SHZ A2017-171) on February 27, 2017.

Indexed as

caspase-12C/EBP homologous proteincerebral ischemia/reperfusion injuryendoplasmic reticulum stressestrogenG1G15glucose-regulated protein 78G protein-coupled estrogen receptornerve regenerationneural regenerationneuronal apoptosis

Identifiers

PMID30804253
PMCPMC6425826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.