ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone)/Praseodymium Doped Zinc Ferrite Composites as Promising Polyelectrolyte Membranes for Fuel Cells.Polymers · 2025Article
- Real-time investigation of reactive oxygen species and radicals evolved from operating Fe-N-C electrocatalysts during the ORR: potential dependence, impact on degradation, and structural comparisons.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Bypassing Formation of Oxide Intermediate via Chemical Vapor Deposition for the Synthesis of an Mn-N-C Catalyst with Improved ORR Activity.ACS catalysis · 2023Article
- Effective single web-structured electrode for high membrane electrode assembly performance in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell.Science advances · 2023Article
- Bioinspired and Bioderived Aqueous Electrocatalysis.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Superior Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) Performance Using Short-Side-Chain Perfluorosulfonic Acid (PFSA) Membrane and Ionomer.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Investigation on the Microscopic/Macroscopic Mechanical Properties of a Thermally Annealed NafionPolymers · 2021Article
- Article
- Synthesis of Tailored Perfluoro Unsaturated Monomers for Potential Applications in Proton Exchange Membrane Preparation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review
- Subsize Pt-based intermetallic compound enables long-term cyclic mass activity for fuel-cell oxygen reduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Local probe investigation of electrocatalytic activity.Chemical science · 2020Review
- Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems.Nature materials · 2020Review
- Is the HInternational journal of hydrogen energy · 2020Review
- Recovery of expensive Pt/C catalysts from the end-of-life membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Optimization of Sulfurization Process of Cobalt Sulfide and Nitrogen Doped Carbon Material for Boosting the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalytic Activity in Alkaline Medium.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of development, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) still lack wide market acceptance in vehicles. To understand the expected trajectories of PEMFC attributes that influence adoption, we conducted an expert elicitation assessment of the current and expected future cost and performance of automotive PEMFCs. We elicited 39 experts' assessments of PEMFC system cost, stack durability, and stack power density under a hypothetical, large-scale production scenario. Experts assessed the median 2017 automotive cost to be $75/kW, stack durability to be 4,000 hours, and stack power density to be 2.5 kW/L. However, experts ranged widely in their assessments. Experts' 2017 best cost assessments ranged from $40 to $500/kW, durability assessments ranged from 1,200 to 12,000 hours, and power density assessments ranged from 0.5 to 4 kW/L. Most respondents expected the 2020 cost to fall short of the 2020 target of the US Department of Energy (DOE). However, most respondents anticipated that the DOE's ultimate target of $30/kW would be met by 2050 and a power density of 3 kW/L would be achieved by 2035. Fifteen experts thought that the DOE's ultimate durability target of 8,000 hours would be met by 2050. In general, experts identified high Pt group metal loading as the most significant barrier to reducing cost. Recommended research and development (R&D) funding was allocated to "catalysts and electrodes," followed in decreasing amount by "fuel cell performance and durability," "membranes and electrolytes," and "testing and technical assessment." Our results could be used to inform public and private R&D decisions and technology roadmaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.