Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30804088›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Two Brains in Action: Joint-Action Coding in the Primate Frontal Cortex.

Simone Ferrari-Toniolo, Federica Visco-Comandini, Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Cortical Mechanism Linking Saliency Detection and Motor Reactivity in Rhesus Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A hierarchical model for interpersonal verbal communication.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone Ferrari-TonioloDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, SAPIENZA University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Federica Visco-ComandiniDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, SAPIENZA University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Alexandra Battaglia-MayerDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, SAPIENZA University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy alexandra.battagliamayer@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0001-6565-357X
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily life often requires the coordination of our actions with those of another partner. After 50 years (1968-2018) of behavioral neurophysiology of motor control, the neural mechanisms that allow such coordination in primates are unknown. We studied this issue by recording cell activity simultaneously from dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) of two male interacting monkeys trained to coordinate their hand forces to achieve a common goal. We found a population of "joint-action cells" that discharged preferentially when monkeys cooperated in the task. This modulation was predictive in nature, because in most cells neural activity led in time the changes of the "own" and of the "other" behavior. These neurons encoded the joint-performance more accurately than "canonical action-related cells", activated by the action per se, regardless of the individual versus interactive context. A decoding of joint-action was obtained by combining the two brains' activities, using cells with directional properties distinguished from those associated to the "solo" behaviors. Action observation-related activity studied when one monkey observed the consequences of the partner's behavior, i.e., the cursor's motion on the screen, did not sharpen the accuracy of joint-action cells' representation, suggesting that it plays no major role in encoding joint-action. When monkeys performed with a non-interactive partner, such as a computer, joint-action cells' representation of the other (non-cooperative) behavior was significantly degraded. These findings provide evidence of how premotor neurons integrate the time-varying representation of the self-action with that of a co-actor, thus offering a neural substrate for successful visuomotor coordination between individuals.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCooperative BehaviorMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalMotor ActivityMotor CortexNeuronsPsychomotor Performanceinterpersonal coordinationjoint-actionmonkeysmotor systemspremotor cortexsocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID30804088
PMCPMC6495132
OpenAlexW2918077216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.